Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
Words
| QUOTE |
| Hi Brother Eric, I think I have made a big mistake! About 9 months ago I joined the JBS cause I thought they were on the ball exposing the CFR, United Nations and the New World Order, etc, etc. Last night, I was at Victoria, Texas and attended a speech given by John McManus about the Treasury and the Fed spending all our money, etc, etc. After the speech, he was taking questions, so I said that it was great that the JBS was exposing the conspiricy and all. Then I asked him what about the Jesuits?, how come theyr'e not mentioned? So, he told me that they haven't been involved since the late seventeen hundreds and don't waste any time on them. Today I did a search on him and found out he graduated from the Jesuit Holy Cross College!!! What is going on??? Why would the Jesuits want to be involved exposing the conpiracys?? I'm all screwed up in my head now, who do I trust??? If you can help me out Eric, I would appreciate it Brother James Corpus Christi, Texas |
Dear Brother James,
John McManus is an Irish Roman Catholic serving the Order. His purpose in heading the JBS is to create anti-communist fury (the Jesuits backing all the communist legislation for the last 80 years) to drive the "religious" Whites, Catholic and Protestant, into Jesuit fascism. All the noted Birchers were pro-Rome not one exception. This includes Gary Allen, Alan Stang, Robert Welch (who was baptized into the RCC on his deathbed) and John Stormer.
Jesuit College of the Holy Cross is the alma mater of Chris Matthews, Robert Maheu, Edward Bennett Williams and a host of other Jesuit coadjutors. I know of a Calvinist who was thrown out of McManus' office when he told McManus of his biblical position. Thus, as demonstrated, McManus covers for the Jesuits.
Lord Bless,
Brother Eric
Oh isn't it funny how Temporal Coadjutors will gladly admit that the Jesuits had a grip over the powers of the World in the 17th and 18th centuries but no longer. So all of a sudden we're led to believe the Jesuits have no power after controlling the World through the Farnese Papal Bloodline commissioned Society of Jesus, counter-Reformation. What a wonderful way of diverting attention away from Papal Rome which have removed themselves from the history books and promoted false history within the 20th century onwards.
The Jesuits gained control of the British East India Company and Dutch West India Company. These two joined to form what some claim is the Committee of 300. The Jesuits still dominate this planet and if you lived in Rome, you'd hear them boast about it openly! We've proven time and time again the connection to the Harlot and her Dragon control.
Once again whilst these temporal coadjutors and their sheople gatekeepers promote the Jew as the enemy. We show how their merely Hofjudens and highlight the connection of Sabbatai Zevi & Jacob Frank to Roman Catholism. People ignore that all commerce is done under the Roman Mithra, Gregorian calendar. Why don't we see all commerce done under the m_____(This word is degoratory for certain people, so I put a blank on Oxley's word) Moon/Sun Jewish calendar or the Moon calendar of the Islamists? No all we see is the Roman Calendar in domination of the commerical world. This is because the Romans are in control of all business on this Earth. They put loyal Hofjuden Sabbateans in positions of banking power as a front and because this race is more suitable for the role and nothing more. It was the Roman Empire who perfected the International Maritime Admiralty Law (UCC). This is now based on Vatican Canon Law, what does this tell you? Your Social Security and National Insurance numbers are merely your Harlot 666 numbers to do business and exist in their Nimrod created civilisation and its society.
Now we're told that the Jew controls Hollywood. Why is it then we never see synagogues in all the films? Why is it we never see any Protestant churches in all the films? Their made on so-called Protestant land right? All you will see if Roman Catholic churches and Priests of false Christianity. Why is this exactly? Why would they want to condition people to the mother Harlot church exactly? Is it ready for the joining of Protestants and Catholics shortly, as we see clearly coming with the Anglican church as early as this year 2009 possibly? Theres your answer! All whilst people ignore the Jesuit Orsini Papal bloodline control of Hollywood along with the Jesuit Breakspear Family. The shadow 'Zoroastrian/Mithra' hierachy of the Jesuit Order with their Superior General controlling the World. Lets not forget Alan Rosenberg (Orsini) as the President of the Screen Actors Guild.
Wheres the Jewish symbols of control and power over Washington D.C? There are none! All whilst we see Roman Empire Facaes of Jesuit Facism all over the place. We see them on the old senate seal, we see them on the arms of the chair of Lincoln's monument, we see them behind the Roman U.S President in the Capitol Building. A building named after Capitoline Hill of Rome, only 6 more hills to go and you have the Harlot, we are warned about in the King James AV1611 Bible. We even see the Phyrigian cap of Mithra on the old senate seal. All as Washington D.C is a sovereign Roman state built upon Roman Catholic land once owned by Francis Pope and Daniell Carroll. The very Carroll family which founded the Jesuit 'military fortress' Georgetown University. The very sovereign state which enslaved the united states of America populance to its ten square Saturnalien mile power only via the un-ratified 14th Amendment and enslaved them even further with the un-ratified 16th Amendment. So tell me again who controls the United States corporation? It's even has the colours of the Orsini for Godsake.
Now back to that King James AV1611 Bible we see all stems from the true biblical Christianity which came long before Roman Pagan false Christianity. You see it all stems from the Waldensians! Now Rome will once again try to fool us and claim a Pierre Vaudès created this religion but this is nonsense. This true-Christianity didn't start in the 12 Century, it actually started in the 2nd Century many a century before the Roman Institute of lies was ever created. People must do their homework on the true Waldensians now and see whats really gone on. The Jesuit controls all our education and blatantly lies and writes out part of history to suit their agenda and to put you off the scent. So if the Waldensians created Christianity then the Roman Institute is the Heretic it claims everyone else is.
Interesting to see how the very Pope behind the Gregorian calendar, Pope Gregory XIII is tied to the powerful soon to be Jesuit hierachy Alessandro Cardinal Farnese. The same Alessandro who was the nephew of soon to be Jesuit Pope Paul III. These were the people who commission the Society of Jesus and Loyola for the destruction of the Counter-Reformation and the Saracens. All commanded via the Villa Farnese in Lazio, Italy! The same very building with maps from the 1600s showing you the exact locations of Washington D.C, The Washington Monument and the Virginnian Pentagon. The very Pentagon controlled by the Jesuit/SMOM Confederate military. The very Pentagon based on Villa Farnese itself! So tell me where the Jews have power or anyone else other than the mighty Romans? I give you the truth, do as you please with the knowledge, follow whatever path you desire but only mine will take you to the real omega powerpoint of the Papal Bloodline Nobility hierachy of the Jesuit Order. The Order of Orders! -CRAIG OXLEY
________________________
Dear Mr. Phelps,
I've been listening to your show for the past few weeks and I was wondering if you have the time to answer some of my questions regarding the history of Poland and the Jesuits. I'm a bit confused because even though Poles are Roman Catholic, they seem to have done a lot of good in certain points in history.
Agreed. Their nationalism was very great which had to be neutralized during and after Pius XII's WWII.
One of the greatest was being a safe haven for Jews while nearly every country was kicking them out. King Casimir the Great was even called "king of the serfs and the Jews." In the century and a half beginning 1500, the number of Jews in Poland increased tenfold from fifty thousand to half a million. In 1632 King Ladislaus IV of Poland forbid Anti-Semitic books and printings. In 1648 the Jewish population of Poland was 450,000; the total population of Jews in the world was 750,000. During this period Poland was able to defend itself from powerful foreign invaders and during the Polish/Lithuanian commonwealth it became one of the wealthiest countries in Europe.
Clearly, the blessing pronounced upon a Gentile people that blesses the racial Jews in their midst, brings blessing from God as per the promise found in Genesis 12:1-3. It does not matter what religion that nation may be; as long as it does not "curse" or persecute its Jews it will be blessed financially, militarily, and culturally. It is a spiritual law of physics that cannot be broken, the risen Son of God being its enforcer.
Did the Jesuits want to destroy Poland because of this?
Yes, the Jesuits had purposed on the destruction of Poland and its nationalists since the beginning of the creation of "The Pale of Settlement," of which Poland was the center. Jews of Russia were driven West beginning with the reign of Czar Nicholas I, who had a concordat with Pope Pius IX. The Order had plotted to foment war between "liberal" Nationalist Roman Catholic Poland and "heretic" Orthodox Russia to destroy Poland's nationalists and also to overthrow the anti-papacy Orthodox Patriarch and leaders in Moscow. This began in earnest with the conflicts between Poland and Russia in the mid 1800s. The Great Emigration that forced 10,000 Polish leaders and men of science into exile was futher intended by the Jesuits, they using Czar Nickolas I, to crush Polish nationalism. The Black Pope's return to the Dark Ages will not tolerate true nationalism and nationalist leaders including the great Polish General Wladyslaw Sikorski.
Another note in history was the Polish-Soviet war. From my brief knowledge, it looked like Poland did a very good thing in stopping the Soviets from taking over and starting communist revolutions throughout Europe.
Agreed. Sikorski was at the center of that success. The Jews were not persecuted by Polish policies, all of which had to change as per the design of the Order. The persecutions had been in Russia under Alexander III and finally Nickolas II. Many Jews were driven into Poland during the pogroms in preparation for Hitler and Stalin's Eurasian Jewish Holocaust as both Jesuit coadjutors worked together. Then came the Order's Bolshevik Revolution, made to look Jewish, by which it would go to war with Poland ending with a Polish victory in 1921. Notice the Jesuits running Washington did not back Warsaw; they backed Moscow. Soviet Jesuit Vengeance upon "liberal" Poland would have to wait until 1939.
The only thing that bothers me is the artist rendition of the miracle at the Vistula where the Roman Catholic Mary(Isis) appears in the sky and helps them defeat the soviets. I was wondering if you have any information about this war. To me it seemed like the Jesuits got revenge on Poland for this during and after WW2 where many top Polish officers were massacred in Katyn, intellectuals were mass murdered, General Wladyslaw Sikorski’s assassination, and Poland’s ultimate destruction through communism.
Absolutely correct!!!!! The Jesuit Order's Nazi Gestapo and Soviet NKVD worked together to torture and murder the nationalist Poles before Hitler invaded Russia in July of 1941. This includes the Katyn Massacre. Remember also that Sikorski was murdered by British Intelligence and CIA/KGB/MI5 Knight of Malta Kim Philby helped cover up the murder. Sikorski threatened the Allied alliance by rightly accusing Jesuit Stalin of being behind the massacre. Further, believing the Red Army would come to the aid of the Polish uprising against the Nazis in Warsaw in 1945, Jesuit Stalin ordered his commanders not to come to stand down and watch the slaughter. Rather, some 60,000 patriotic Poles were killed by the Nazi German Army without one shot being fired in their defense by the Red Army. This eliminated more nationalists for the benefit of the pope's Soviet forces and KGB occupying Poland during the Cold War. Remember also that all the Roman Catholic Archbishops were working with the KGB to inform on any Polish resistence movements against the Soviets financed by the US via Lend-Lease at the behest of Georgetown University Jesuit Priest and Knight of Malta Edmund A. Walsh.
Luckily my parents escaped and I had the privilege growing up in Canada. I have a problem because the people here in the Polish community are extremely anti-Semitic, especially the youth. Whenever I pick up a Polish newspaper they always preach hardcore Catholicism and anti-Semitism openly. I have also noticed many people in the community are Nazi sympathizers and support fascism. I often hear Poles, again especially the youth, saying that even though Hitler invaded Poland, everything else he did was right. I can't stand to see this happen and I'm not able to tell them the truth because I'm not well equipped with knowledge regarding these issues. I was wondering if you could offer me more information on this because I hate to see how my people have bought into the idea that Polishness is Popishiness.
The Polish learned to hate the Jews via the Jesuits who really controlled education in Poland. Coupled with that indoctrination, since the Order made the Soviets look as if the Jews ran the "USSR" not forgetting that a Jesuit-admiring, Polish Roman Catholic turned "Bolshevik" was the first head of the Cheka, the Poles blamed the Jews for Katyn and every other atrocity the Soviets perpetrated upon the "liberal" nationalistic Poles. Reducing Roman Catholic Poland was a masterstroke of Jesuit genius---as is being done here at this moment in North America.
On a side note, I came across some of your lectures where you briefly talk about geocentricity and I was wondering if there are any books you would recommend reading about this subject.
The Earth is Not Moving, by Marshall Hall.
Lord Bless,
Brother Eric
I've been listening to your show for the past few weeks and I was wondering if you have the time to answer some of my questions regarding the history of Poland and the Jesuits. I'm a bit confused because even though Poles are Roman Catholic, they seem to have done a lot of good in certain points in history.
Agreed. Their nationalism was very great which had to be neutralized during and after Pius XII's WWII.
One of the greatest was being a safe haven for Jews while nearly every country was kicking them out. King Casimir the Great was even called "king of the serfs and the Jews." In the century and a half beginning 1500, the number of Jews in Poland increased tenfold from fifty thousand to half a million. In 1632 King Ladislaus IV of Poland forbid Anti-Semitic books and printings. In 1648 the Jewish population of Poland was 450,000; the total population of Jews in the world was 750,000. During this period Poland was able to defend itself from powerful foreign invaders and during the Polish/Lithuanian commonwealth it became one of the wealthiest countries in Europe.
Clearly, the blessing pronounced upon a Gentile people that blesses the racial Jews in their midst, brings blessing from God as per the promise found in Genesis 12:1-3. It does not matter what religion that nation may be; as long as it does not "curse" or persecute its Jews it will be blessed financially, militarily, and culturally. It is a spiritual law of physics that cannot be broken, the risen Son of God being its enforcer.
Did the Jesuits want to destroy Poland because of this?
Yes, the Jesuits had purposed on the destruction of Poland and its nationalists since the beginning of the creation of "The Pale of Settlement," of which Poland was the center. Jews of Russia were driven West beginning with the reign of Czar Nicholas I, who had a concordat with Pope Pius IX. The Order had plotted to foment war between "liberal" Nationalist Roman Catholic Poland and "heretic" Orthodox Russia to destroy Poland's nationalists and also to overthrow the anti-papacy Orthodox Patriarch and leaders in Moscow. This began in earnest with the conflicts between Poland and Russia in the mid 1800s. The Great Emigration that forced 10,000 Polish leaders and men of science into exile was futher intended by the Jesuits, they using Czar Nickolas I, to crush Polish nationalism. The Black Pope's return to the Dark Ages will not tolerate true nationalism and nationalist leaders including the great Polish General Wladyslaw Sikorski.
Another note in history was the Polish-Soviet war. From my brief knowledge, it looked like Poland did a very good thing in stopping the Soviets from taking over and starting communist revolutions throughout Europe.
Agreed. Sikorski was at the center of that success. The Jews were not persecuted by Polish policies, all of which had to change as per the design of the Order. The persecutions had been in Russia under Alexander III and finally Nickolas II. Many Jews were driven into Poland during the pogroms in preparation for Hitler and Stalin's Eurasian Jewish Holocaust as both Jesuit coadjutors worked together. Then came the Order's Bolshevik Revolution, made to look Jewish, by which it would go to war with Poland ending with a Polish victory in 1921. Notice the Jesuits running Washington did not back Warsaw; they backed Moscow. Soviet Jesuit Vengeance upon "liberal" Poland would have to wait until 1939.
The only thing that bothers me is the artist rendition of the miracle at the Vistula where the Roman Catholic Mary(Isis) appears in the sky and helps them defeat the soviets. I was wondering if you have any information about this war. To me it seemed like the Jesuits got revenge on Poland for this during and after WW2 where many top Polish officers were massacred in Katyn, intellectuals were mass murdered, General Wladyslaw Sikorski’s assassination, and Poland’s ultimate destruction through communism.
Absolutely correct!!!!! The Jesuit Order's Nazi Gestapo and Soviet NKVD worked together to torture and murder the nationalist Poles before Hitler invaded Russia in July of 1941. This includes the Katyn Massacre. Remember also that Sikorski was murdered by British Intelligence and CIA/KGB/MI5 Knight of Malta Kim Philby helped cover up the murder. Sikorski threatened the Allied alliance by rightly accusing Jesuit Stalin of being behind the massacre. Further, believing the Red Army would come to the aid of the Polish uprising against the Nazis in Warsaw in 1945, Jesuit Stalin ordered his commanders not to come to stand down and watch the slaughter. Rather, some 60,000 patriotic Poles were killed by the Nazi German Army without one shot being fired in their defense by the Red Army. This eliminated more nationalists for the benefit of the pope's Soviet forces and KGB occupying Poland during the Cold War. Remember also that all the Roman Catholic Archbishops were working with the KGB to inform on any Polish resistence movements against the Soviets financed by the US via Lend-Lease at the behest of Georgetown University Jesuit Priest and Knight of Malta Edmund A. Walsh.
Luckily my parents escaped and I had the privilege growing up in Canada. I have a problem because the people here in the Polish community are extremely anti-Semitic, especially the youth. Whenever I pick up a Polish newspaper they always preach hardcore Catholicism and anti-Semitism openly. I have also noticed many people in the community are Nazi sympathizers and support fascism. I often hear Poles, again especially the youth, saying that even though Hitler invaded Poland, everything else he did was right. I can't stand to see this happen and I'm not able to tell them the truth because I'm not well equipped with knowledge regarding these issues. I was wondering if you could offer me more information on this because I hate to see how my people have bought into the idea that Polishness is Popishiness.
The Polish learned to hate the Jews via the Jesuits who really controlled education in Poland. Coupled with that indoctrination, since the Order made the Soviets look as if the Jews ran the "USSR" not forgetting that a Jesuit-admiring, Polish Roman Catholic turned "Bolshevik" was the first head of the Cheka, the Poles blamed the Jews for Katyn and every other atrocity the Soviets perpetrated upon the "liberal" nationalistic Poles. Reducing Roman Catholic Poland was a masterstroke of Jesuit genius---as is being done here at this moment in North America.
On a side note, I came across some of your lectures where you briefly talk about geocentricity and I was wondering if there are any books you would recommend reading about this subject.
The Earth is Not Moving, by Marshall Hall.
Lord Bless,
Brother Eric
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Piper
Dear Brethren and Friends,
Greg Szymanski is hosting a debate between me and Michael Collins Piper today from 2-4pm EST. If unable to listen, it will be archived on Greg's site. www.thearticbeacon.com
It took me a week to read his most informative book, Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy. I learned much and the book is loaded with many significant facts.
Mr. Piper contends it was the Mossad that was the driving force behind the assassination. Though the Mossad had motive and was indeed involved in the assassination, it was the Vatican's Jesuits that oversaw the assassination: the Mossad was one of their many factions overseen by CIA Counterintelligence chief, James Jesus Angleton. Mr. Piper rightly portrays Angleton as the great personage manipulating events behind the assassination both before and after. But Piper wrongly states that Angleton was a creature of the Mossad, its minion in the CIA.
Final Judgment's great flaws are the following:
1. No mention is ever made of the Council on Foreign Relations in the body of his thesis. Only one mention is made of the CFR when critiquing a book in one of his appendixes.
2. No mention is ever made of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM). This is a critical mistake in that Angleton was a SMOM along with William F. Buckley, Jr., John McCone, Clay Shaw, Henry Luce and Alexander Haig, Jr., (whose brother Francis is a Jesuit) all of whom are named in FJ.
3. No mention is made of the secret meeting between all the players in the assassination at Clint Murchison's mansion on the night before the murder. Those in attendance were J. Edgar Hoover, John McCloy, Carlos Marcello, Lyndon Johnson and, among others, Jack Ruby.
What I learned from FJ was that JFK was against Israel's development of nuclear weapons and thus was an enemy of Masonic Jewish Zionist David Ben-Gurion. (Remember Revisionist Zionist Vladimir Jabotinsky called the Prime Minister "Stalin Ben-Gurion Hitler.") Further, if JFK sought to break the CIA into a thousand pieces, he would have effectively broke its surrogate, the Mossad, into pieces also. Further, if JFK sought to end the Pope's Cold War PREMATURELY in 1963 (later ended by the Knights of Malta at the Island of Malta in December, 1989), there could have been no justification for LBJ's military buildup of Israel that led to the Black Pope's successful 1967 war resulting in the Labor Zionist possession of the temple mount, having taken it away from Jordan. The 1967 war prepared for this present Papal Crusade against Islam (called for by Angleton) to include the ultimate demolition of the Dome of the Rock thereafter to be replaced with a Third Hebrew Temple---for the Pope. Further, if JFK would have ended the Pope's Cold War, the Vatican---secretly behind the Masonic Jewish Zionist government of Israel but openly against it---would have been forced to openly oppose the Arab nations whom it was befriending and building at that time. Clearly, JFK was an enemy of the Ben-Gurion Government and thus an enemy of the Jesuits ruling the Vatican via Pope Paul VI---the overseer of Pius XII's Vatican Ratlines. (Remember also that the Order sacrificed SS Colonel Adolf Eichmann then living in Argentina thanks to Bishop Hudal, using its CIA-controlled Mossad to bring the ex-Nazi to Jerusalem for trial. This key act saved the government of Ben-Gurion that was about to fall after the revelation that Rudolf Kastner was involved with Eichmann in deporting 400,000 Jews to Auschwitz shortly before the end of the war.) Since the CIA was a creation of the Vatican via the Knights of Malta and high-level Freemasonry, and since the Mossad was a creation of the CIA via SMOM Reinhard Gehlen, then yes, the Mossad was involved in the JFK assassination---Leah Rabin admitting that her husband, Yitzhak Rabin, was in Dallas the day of the murder. This will be included in VAIII because Piper's claims on Mossad involvement are TRUE.
But we are in "the times of the Gentiles" according to the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, which times will end with his second coming (Luke 21:24-27). As long as Jerusalem is under Gentile rule during the international Jewish Diaspora, then Gentiles rule every other faction of world government. This includes Gentile supremacy in banking, politics, religion, organized crime, military might and the sciences to name a few. The Jews involved in these arenas are SUBORDINATE, not Supreme over Gentiles. This is in perfect agreement with Deuteronomy 28:44, the Gentile being the head, the Jew being the tail this day.
The Gentile Jesuits of power have reversed this truth (ah, Black is White and White is Black), seeking to place the blame for the demise of world---and the United States---on the Jews in general. This is classic Jesuitism, and this is what Michael Collins Piper has done.
The debate will be well ordered and quite interesting. Please tune in, but don't drop out!
Sincerely in the Faith,
Brother Eric
_________________________________
If the Liberty Lobby is pushing Piper's books, that explains a lot. The Liberty Lobby was founded by Willis Carto, who was a disciple of the Jesuit trained fascist Francis Parker Yockey. http://www.johnreilly.info/dod.htm
-Mark Brewer
____________________
Agreed. To avoid the mass of historical facts against the Jesuits amassed by both of us---and many others---is to be either ignorant or dishonest. Mr. Piper is not ignorant of the power of the Vatican and is quite familiar with the Jesuit Order's Vatican house organ, La Civilta Cattolica. Although he conducted himself as a gentleman, I am more convinced than ever that he is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Thank you for contacting me.
Mr. Piper is a gentleman as is the host Mr. Szymanski. Mr. Smith lacks that quality evidenced by his past ad hominem attacks against me; although, I would debate him pursuant to the same identical ground rules to which Mr. Piper and myself agreed. A debate must always be for the benefit of the listening audience. Thus the opponents must address the claims of one another and refrain from sweeping frontal attacks which are unproductive leading to emotional responses depriving the audience of hitherto unknown facts necessary to reach reasonable conclusions.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Rebuttal: Piper-Phelps Debate
by Vyzygoth
With all the falderal that surrounded the Michael Collins Piper - Eric Jon Phelps debate, which you, Victor, proclaimed a “unanimous decision” in favor of the former, I felt the need to pass along some final comments regarding the thesis of Phelps’ work.
I am not coming to his defense. He didn’t and wouldn’t ask me to do such. He’s a big boy and has acquitted himself well in the rough-and-tumble of talk-show discussions, call-ins, and the like.
What I think might have gotten lost in the winner-take-all atmosphere you engendered in your critique of the debate is an understanding that the accusations leveled at the Vatican and Jesuits are well-founded. I believe people should be aware that there are an abundance of books, newspaper accounts, and personal correspondences from across the centuries that indict the Vatican and the Jesuit Order for desiring world rule—a second Holy Roman Empire, if you will.
This is not conjecture. This is not theory. This is history. And it’s there for all to read.
Phelps and Charles T. Wilcox have done, what I consider, the best work on the Vatican-Jesuit nexus.
They, in turn, have based their work on the forms of information mentioned above. That information should be accessed—as I have done—to determine the veracity of Phelps’ and Wilcox’s works.
Years ago, when I looked into this, I did so not believing that what Phelps was maintaining was, in fact, true. But I had to find out. And I found that the Vatican and the Jesuits run the show.
Christians are forewarned in the New Testament that the enemy would eventually be found inside the gate, that Satan would come not as a hideous monster but as one of their own.
Therefore, what better disguise to wear than one of religiosity?
The Vatican is the smiley face; the Jesuits are the enforcers.
Undoubtedly, during the twentieth century, many global and quasi-political organizations have emerged. All have a job to do. But this entire New World Order network is not a horizontal structure.
The Zionist movement—measured against the Vatican/Jesuit existence—is modern. The relationship between the Rothschilds—perhaps the preeminent Zionists—and the Vatican is well-documented.
When I read accounts from the nineteenth century—especially mid-century—our political leaders are warned to be wary of Vatican not Zionist provocateuring.
At the Secret Treaty of Verona in 1822, several monarchies—the Holy Alliance—pledged themselves to destroy the concept of popular government that had taken root in the United States. It was called the Holy Alliance because the monarchies were pledged to do the bidding of the Vatican, not the Zionists.
When John Surratt fled the U.S. because of his role in the Lincoln assassination, he found safe haven in the Vatican Guard. The U.S. threatened the Vatican with a cessation of diplomatic relations unless Surratt was returned.
When Cecil Rhodes was preparing his Round Table to pursue his dream of global rule, he wished to create an organization that mirrored the Jesuits. The oath the initiates would take was to be based on the Jesuit oath. Nothing there about Zionism.
How many times have we seen our heads of state with the pope in the Vatican? How many times in the City of London?
Certainly Zionism is a palpable force in the United States, but it has become a much bigger concern in the last half of the twentieth century, with a dramatic intensification under the current administration.
I don’t deny that Zionism has had and is having an impact in the United States. I do wonder sometimes if resentment toward Zionism is pouring over to encompass all Jewry, all those who live in Israel? Is this fervor fueling what might turn out to be a pogrom?
In his analysis, Victor criticized Phelps for too often throwing together “dates, countries, names. . . .”
I would think that sort of information is referential and necessary.
Victor said the information was “never qualified by substantive (or significant) facts.”
To make that pronouncement, I think it would’ve been better if he had first checked out Phelp’s Vatican Assassins and Wilcox’s Transformation of the Republic and any/all of the works both authors list in their bibliographies.
With regard to the contradictions that exist between what the Vatican states publicly and does privately through the Jesuits, does Victor think it a stretch—since he clearly understands the NWO’s modus operandi—that duplicity, false fronts, and the Hegelian Dialectic are also in play with the Vatican?
Both Zionists and the Vatican ultimately wish to rule the world from Jerusalem. The Vatican is quite content to let the world’s ire draw down upon the Zionists, while it goes about its dirty business undetected.
The role of Zionism in the Grand Scheme cannot be denied, but to underestimate the power of the Vatican-Jesuit nexus is a huge mistake.
Greg Szymanski is hosting a debate between me and Michael Collins Piper today from 2-4pm EST. If unable to listen, it will be archived on Greg's site. www.thearticbeacon.com
It took me a week to read his most informative book, Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy. I learned much and the book is loaded with many significant facts.
Mr. Piper contends it was the Mossad that was the driving force behind the assassination. Though the Mossad had motive and was indeed involved in the assassination, it was the Vatican's Jesuits that oversaw the assassination: the Mossad was one of their many factions overseen by CIA Counterintelligence chief, James Jesus Angleton. Mr. Piper rightly portrays Angleton as the great personage manipulating events behind the assassination both before and after. But Piper wrongly states that Angleton was a creature of the Mossad, its minion in the CIA.
Final Judgment's great flaws are the following:
1. No mention is ever made of the Council on Foreign Relations in the body of his thesis. Only one mention is made of the CFR when critiquing a book in one of his appendixes.
2. No mention is ever made of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM). This is a critical mistake in that Angleton was a SMOM along with William F. Buckley, Jr., John McCone, Clay Shaw, Henry Luce and Alexander Haig, Jr., (whose brother Francis is a Jesuit) all of whom are named in FJ.
3. No mention is made of the secret meeting between all the players in the assassination at Clint Murchison's mansion on the night before the murder. Those in attendance were J. Edgar Hoover, John McCloy, Carlos Marcello, Lyndon Johnson and, among others, Jack Ruby.
What I learned from FJ was that JFK was against Israel's development of nuclear weapons and thus was an enemy of Masonic Jewish Zionist David Ben-Gurion. (Remember Revisionist Zionist Vladimir Jabotinsky called the Prime Minister "Stalin Ben-Gurion Hitler.") Further, if JFK sought to break the CIA into a thousand pieces, he would have effectively broke its surrogate, the Mossad, into pieces also. Further, if JFK sought to end the Pope's Cold War PREMATURELY in 1963 (later ended by the Knights of Malta at the Island of Malta in December, 1989), there could have been no justification for LBJ's military buildup of Israel that led to the Black Pope's successful 1967 war resulting in the Labor Zionist possession of the temple mount, having taken it away from Jordan. The 1967 war prepared for this present Papal Crusade against Islam (called for by Angleton) to include the ultimate demolition of the Dome of the Rock thereafter to be replaced with a Third Hebrew Temple---for the Pope. Further, if JFK would have ended the Pope's Cold War, the Vatican---secretly behind the Masonic Jewish Zionist government of Israel but openly against it---would have been forced to openly oppose the Arab nations whom it was befriending and building at that time. Clearly, JFK was an enemy of the Ben-Gurion Government and thus an enemy of the Jesuits ruling the Vatican via Pope Paul VI---the overseer of Pius XII's Vatican Ratlines. (Remember also that the Order sacrificed SS Colonel Adolf Eichmann then living in Argentina thanks to Bishop Hudal, using its CIA-controlled Mossad to bring the ex-Nazi to Jerusalem for trial. This key act saved the government of Ben-Gurion that was about to fall after the revelation that Rudolf Kastner was involved with Eichmann in deporting 400,000 Jews to Auschwitz shortly before the end of the war.) Since the CIA was a creation of the Vatican via the Knights of Malta and high-level Freemasonry, and since the Mossad was a creation of the CIA via SMOM Reinhard Gehlen, then yes, the Mossad was involved in the JFK assassination---Leah Rabin admitting that her husband, Yitzhak Rabin, was in Dallas the day of the murder. This will be included in VAIII because Piper's claims on Mossad involvement are TRUE.
But we are in "the times of the Gentiles" according to the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, which times will end with his second coming (Luke 21:24-27). As long as Jerusalem is under Gentile rule during the international Jewish Diaspora, then Gentiles rule every other faction of world government. This includes Gentile supremacy in banking, politics, religion, organized crime, military might and the sciences to name a few. The Jews involved in these arenas are SUBORDINATE, not Supreme over Gentiles. This is in perfect agreement with Deuteronomy 28:44, the Gentile being the head, the Jew being the tail this day.
The Gentile Jesuits of power have reversed this truth (ah, Black is White and White is Black), seeking to place the blame for the demise of world---and the United States---on the Jews in general. This is classic Jesuitism, and this is what Michael Collins Piper has done.
The debate will be well ordered and quite interesting. Please tune in, but don't drop out!
Sincerely in the Faith,
Brother Eric
_________________________________
If the Liberty Lobby is pushing Piper's books, that explains a lot. The Liberty Lobby was founded by Willis Carto, who was a disciple of the Jesuit trained fascist Francis Parker Yockey. http://www.johnreilly.info/dod.htm
-Mark Brewer
____________________
Agreed. To avoid the mass of historical facts against the Jesuits amassed by both of us---and many others---is to be either ignorant or dishonest. Mr. Piper is not ignorant of the power of the Vatican and is quite familiar with the Jesuit Order's Vatican house organ, La Civilta Cattolica. Although he conducted himself as a gentleman, I am more convinced than ever that he is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Thank you for contacting me.
Mr. Piper is a gentleman as is the host Mr. Szymanski. Mr. Smith lacks that quality evidenced by his past ad hominem attacks against me; although, I would debate him pursuant to the same identical ground rules to which Mr. Piper and myself agreed. A debate must always be for the benefit of the listening audience. Thus the opponents must address the claims of one another and refrain from sweeping frontal attacks which are unproductive leading to emotional responses depriving the audience of hitherto unknown facts necessary to reach reasonable conclusions.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Rebuttal: Piper-Phelps Debate
by Vyzygoth
With all the falderal that surrounded the Michael Collins Piper - Eric Jon Phelps debate, which you, Victor, proclaimed a “unanimous decision” in favor of the former, I felt the need to pass along some final comments regarding the thesis of Phelps’ work.
I am not coming to his defense. He didn’t and wouldn’t ask me to do such. He’s a big boy and has acquitted himself well in the rough-and-tumble of talk-show discussions, call-ins, and the like.
What I think might have gotten lost in the winner-take-all atmosphere you engendered in your critique of the debate is an understanding that the accusations leveled at the Vatican and Jesuits are well-founded. I believe people should be aware that there are an abundance of books, newspaper accounts, and personal correspondences from across the centuries that indict the Vatican and the Jesuit Order for desiring world rule—a second Holy Roman Empire, if you will.
This is not conjecture. This is not theory. This is history. And it’s there for all to read.
Phelps and Charles T. Wilcox have done, what I consider, the best work on the Vatican-Jesuit nexus.
They, in turn, have based their work on the forms of information mentioned above. That information should be accessed—as I have done—to determine the veracity of Phelps’ and Wilcox’s works.
Years ago, when I looked into this, I did so not believing that what Phelps was maintaining was, in fact, true. But I had to find out. And I found that the Vatican and the Jesuits run the show.
Christians are forewarned in the New Testament that the enemy would eventually be found inside the gate, that Satan would come not as a hideous monster but as one of their own.
Therefore, what better disguise to wear than one of religiosity?
The Vatican is the smiley face; the Jesuits are the enforcers.
Undoubtedly, during the twentieth century, many global and quasi-political organizations have emerged. All have a job to do. But this entire New World Order network is not a horizontal structure.
The Zionist movement—measured against the Vatican/Jesuit existence—is modern. The relationship between the Rothschilds—perhaps the preeminent Zionists—and the Vatican is well-documented.
When I read accounts from the nineteenth century—especially mid-century—our political leaders are warned to be wary of Vatican not Zionist provocateuring.
At the Secret Treaty of Verona in 1822, several monarchies—the Holy Alliance—pledged themselves to destroy the concept of popular government that had taken root in the United States. It was called the Holy Alliance because the monarchies were pledged to do the bidding of the Vatican, not the Zionists.
When John Surratt fled the U.S. because of his role in the Lincoln assassination, he found safe haven in the Vatican Guard. The U.S. threatened the Vatican with a cessation of diplomatic relations unless Surratt was returned.
When Cecil Rhodes was preparing his Round Table to pursue his dream of global rule, he wished to create an organization that mirrored the Jesuits. The oath the initiates would take was to be based on the Jesuit oath. Nothing there about Zionism.
How many times have we seen our heads of state with the pope in the Vatican? How many times in the City of London?
Certainly Zionism is a palpable force in the United States, but it has become a much bigger concern in the last half of the twentieth century, with a dramatic intensification under the current administration.
I don’t deny that Zionism has had and is having an impact in the United States. I do wonder sometimes if resentment toward Zionism is pouring over to encompass all Jewry, all those who live in Israel? Is this fervor fueling what might turn out to be a pogrom?
In his analysis, Victor criticized Phelps for too often throwing together “dates, countries, names. . . .”
I would think that sort of information is referential and necessary.
Victor said the information was “never qualified by substantive (or significant) facts.”
To make that pronouncement, I think it would’ve been better if he had first checked out Phelp’s Vatican Assassins and Wilcox’s Transformation of the Republic and any/all of the works both authors list in their bibliographies.
With regard to the contradictions that exist between what the Vatican states publicly and does privately through the Jesuits, does Victor think it a stretch—since he clearly understands the NWO’s modus operandi—that duplicity, false fronts, and the Hegelian Dialectic are also in play with the Vatican?
Both Zionists and the Vatican ultimately wish to rule the world from Jerusalem. The Vatican is quite content to let the world’s ire draw down upon the Zionists, while it goes about its dirty business undetected.
The role of Zionism in the Grand Scheme cannot be denied, but to underestimate the power of the Vatican-Jesuit nexus is a huge mistake.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Fall 1998 The Firearms Sentinel
From http://web.archive.org/web/20050913105035/http://www.jpfo.org/jamaica.htm
Fall 1998 The Firearms Sentinel
How Gun Control "Worked" in Jamaica
© 1998 Tina Terry
Those who stridently and self-righteously lobby for the seizure of all guns by the government in America, particularly women like Sarah Brady, Barbra Streisand, Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, would do well to study the results of forced disarmament in other countries.
I have personally lived through a government-instigated disarmament of the general public, and its subsequent, disastrous consequences: From 1961 to 1977 my father (who is a white American, as are my mother, sister and I) was stationed with his family and business in Kingston, Jamaica.
Around 1972, the political situation in Jamaica had so seriously deteriorated that there were constant shootings and gun battles throughout the city of Kingston and in many of the outlying parishes (counties). In years past no one had even had to lock their doors, but now many people hardly dared venture out of their homes. This was especially true for white people, and even more especially for Americans, because of the real risk of being gunned down or kidnapped and held hostage by Jamaicans, who had become increasingly hostile towards whites and foreigners. My father took his life into his hands every morning simply driving to work. Going to the market or to do a simple errand was often a terrifying prospect. The open hatred and hostility which was directed at us seemed ready at any time to explode into violence, and indeed did so towards many people on many occasions, often with tragic or fatal results.
The Jamaican government decided that the only solution to this volatile situation was to declare martial law overnight, and to demand that all guns and bullets owned by anyone but the police and the military be turned into the police within 24 hours. The government decreed that anyone caught with even one bullet would be immediately, and without trial, incarcerated in what was essentially a barbed-wire enclosed concentration camp which had been speedily erected in the middle of Kingston. In true Orwellian fashion, the government referred to this camp as "the gun court."
My father and all of our American, Canadian, British and European friends, as well as middle class Jamaicans of all colors (locally referred to as "black," 'white," or "beige") knew that we were all natural targets of this kind of draconian government punishment. The relentless anti-American propaganda spewed forth by Michael Manley, Jamaica's admittedly pro-Castro Prime Minister, had resulted in the widespread hatred of Americans, British and Europeans by many Jamaicans. Racial hatred of whites and "beiges," as well as class hatred of anyone who appeared to have money or property, were rampant.
Consequently, we all dutifully and immediately disarmed ourselves, and handed our weapons in at the nearest police station. It was either that or be sent straight to the gun court. Even after we had disarmed ourselves, we lived in deathly fear that the cops, not known for their integrity, and well-known for their hatred of whites and Americans, would plant a gun or bullet on our property or persons.
So there we all were - government-disarmed, sitting-duck, law-abiding citizens and expatriates. Anyone can guess what happened next: the rampant and unfettered carnage began in earnest. Robberies, kidnappings, murders, burglaries, rapes - all committed by the vast populace of still-armed criminals. Doubtless the criminals were positively ecstatic that the government had been so helpful in creating all these juicy and utterly defenseless victims for their easy prey.
We've all heard the phrase, "When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns." I can personally confirm that this statement is absolutely and painfully true, because that is exactly how the Jamaican disarmament worked. At the time of the disarmament order, I was away at boarding school in the United States. However, I remember vividly coming home for the summer. I remember the muted but pervasive atmosphere of tension and terror which constantly permeated our household, affecting even our loyal black servants, who worked for and lived with us, and whom we took care of. (Practically every household in Jamaica, except the very poorest, had live-in servants. There was no welfare or public school in Jamaica, so middle-class families became completely responsible for the well-being of their servants, who were considered to be part of the family, including taking them to the doctor, and helping to educate their children.)
I remember lying awake in bed at night, clutching the handle of an ice-pick I had put under my pillow, and listening to the screaming of car-loads of Jamaican gangs going by our house, praying that they wouldn't pick our home to plunder. The favorite tactic was for a group of thugs to roar up to a house, pile out, batter down the door and rape, steal, kill, kidnap... whatever they felt like. They knew the inhabitants had been disarmed, and that they would be met with only fear and defenselessness. My pathetic ice-pick seemed incredibly puny, but it was all I could think of. Our family didn't even own a baseball bat. I remember lying awake thinking about how our beloved dogs were old and feeble, and that they could not protect us. And that I could not protect them either.
I can barely describe the abject terror and helplessness I felt as both a white American and as a young woman during that time. Jamaica was then about 90% black. Although I was (and still am) an American citizen, my family had lived in Kingston for almost 12 years when this situation occurred, and I considered Jamaica to be my real home. Many of my friends were Jamaican. My first serious boy-friend was Jamaican. For all its faults, I loved this beautiful, suffering island dearly, and I felt like a stranger when I was away at school in America, where I was always homesick for Jamaica.
When we had first moved to Jamaica in 1960, my sister and I (both blonde and obviously white) had been able to ride our horses up into the hills, and, whenever we encountered local Jamaicans, their salutation to us was open and friendly, as was ours to them. As things deteriorated into the reign of terror, and then the government instituted overnight citizen disarmament, when we ventured outside our home, we almost always encountered hate-filled stares and hostile hisses of, "Eh, white bitch! Eh, look 'ere, white bitch!" and other unprintable epithets.
Jamaica was, in the 1970's, a country with at least 50% illiteracy and an illegitimacy rate of over 50%. If a Jamaican girl wasn't pregnant by the age of 15 or 16, she was often derisively branded "a mule," sinc s, the offspring of horses and donkeys, are almost always sterile. Being a woman, let alone a white woman, in such a climate, especially after the disarmament of the citizenry by the government, was one of the most terrifying experiences one can imagine.
At that time, I had never held or fired a gun. I had rarely ever even seen a gun. No one in my family had ever learned about, used or even talked about firearms, except my father, who had been in the U.S. army. In our social circle, guns were deemed "unseemly" and "inappropriate" for polite society, and especially for young ladies. I had never given much thought to any of the Bill of Rights, let alone the Second Amendment. Yet we Americans all knew the Bill of Rights did not protect us in Jamaica, just as it hadn't applied to us at our previous station in Singapore.
My dad had fought in World War II, however, and had brought back a Luger pistol, which he had taken with him to Jamaica when we moved there after having spent 6 years in Singapore. No law had prevented his bringing a gun to Jamaica in 1960. When my dad handed that pistol and all his bullets in to the police, I vaguely realized that he was no longer allowed by the government to protect my mom, my sister or me, or our household.
I was pretty confused at the time. Terrified of being kidnapped, raped, murdered, robbed, at the same time I was still mindlessly anti-gun, because the criminals all had guns, and the government had declared guns to be contraband, and we were all terrified of being hurt by bad guys with guns, all of which somehow meant that guns must be "dangerous" and "bad" and therefore should be banned, just as the Jamaican government had decreed. As white Americans, our status was that of permanent guests in a foreign and increasingly hostile country. In fact, after 6 years in Singapore, and 12 in Jamaica, we well knew how to strive to be "model guests," which meant that questioning or challenging the Jamaican government's authority was unthinkable -- even when such government authority decreed that we be made helpless. None of us had any illusions about any "rights" to defend ourselves. We might have been able to do so with the government's blessing in the good old days, before chaos and violence and racial hatred had taken over. But now it was different. Now we were white, visible, foreign, sitting ducks in a hostile black sea. And I was a white, visible, foreign, female sitting duck.
As obedient as I was to authority, I grasped that our household was defenseless, and that I as a woman was particularly defenseless. And I realized that, had my dad still had his pistol, I would have felt much safer. I even realized that I would be willing to pick up a gun if my life were threatened. For a person who claimed to be anti-gun, these feelings really confused me.
At least eleven friends and acquaintances of my family were raped, kidnapped, murdered or robbed within about a year after the disarmament, and I believe it is a miracle that we are all still alive. I am convinced that many of these people would not have been victims had they not been disarmed by the Jamaican government. It was tragically ironic that the government had sold this whole disarmament program to us with the promise that: "We're here to help you, and this is for your own good and safety."
Because of this horrid and indelible experience, and of my interest in and undying loyalty to the American Bill of Rights, I have made it my personal business to study the history of the Second Amendment. I have studied related topics, too, such as police responsibility to citizens. It is my belief that many people believe that disarmament is no big deal, because it is the job of the police to protect us. Particularly many women seem to believe this. The media and of government authorities continue to generate pervasive and corrosive propaganda aimed at creating a helpless and disarmed populace. I used to completely believe this propaganda, but I have learned the following realities:
1. The police have no legal duty to protect individual citizens, and cannot be held responsible if they fail to do so. Even if a citizen's 911 call gets through to the emergency center, the police can simply choose not to show up, and the citizen has no legal recourse against the police. The courts have repeatedly ruled on this. As the court wrote in Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1982): "There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state to let the people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order." The U.S. Supreme Court, in MU 59 U.S. 396, ruled in a similar vein as far back as 1856.
2. The police carry guns primarily to defend themselves, not to protect us.
3. Because of items 1 and 2 above, we should all consider the police to be, essentially, historians. They show up after the crime has been committed and attempt to reconstruct and document the history of the crime. If the history is satisfactorily re-constructed, then the perpetrator is apprehended (if he can be found) and then (perhaps) prosecuted. This after-the-fact law enforcement does little good for the dead or wounded crime victims.
4. Women have a particular stake in preserving the right to bear arms. There is no way to describe the helplessness a woman feels when she is disarmed and made helpless by anyone. Add to that the rage she feels when the agency who is disarming her and leaving her at the mercy of rapists, murderers, goons and thugs, is a sanctimonious government telling her that it's "for her own good."
Although there are many serious issues in today's roiling political and social stew, I believe that preserving and restoring the Bill of Rights in general, and the Second Amendment in particular, is the most pivotal and basic issue to all Americans, and particularly female Americans, even if they don't yet know it. The consummate idiocy propounded by some folks (including some women) that the Second Amendment exists only to protect sportsmen's rights is particularly ridiculous relevant to women, most of whom don't hunt, and who care more about being able to get a decent hand-gun for self-protection than a hunting rifle to pursue deer or elk.
Anyone who thinks the Bill of Rights is either "out of date," "hokey" or "needs revising" - all of which I've heard from well-meaning but tragically ignorant and complacent Americans - should try living in a country which doesn't have one. I have been there and done that, and I don't want to go through it ever again - especially not in my own native nation. So I am dedicated to preventing today's government nanny from turning, as so often has occurred in history, into tomorrow's government despot.
Finally, I implore anyone reading this, particularly women, to likewise dedicate themselves to studying this issue carefully, and to likewise taking an active stance to preserve the Bill of Rights in general and the Second Amendment in particular.
Postscript: As of the latter part of August of this year (1998), it doesn't appear that the situation in Jamaica has changed much for the better. Many Jamaicans of all colors have immigrated to America to start businesses and to escape the hopelessness of the situation in their homeland. I recently spoke with a black Jamaican named Marcus, who has opened a wonderful Jamaican restaurant in Phoenix named Likkle Montego, where I can go and eat Jamaican food, and catch the latest news from my long-lost home. When asked how things are today in Kingston, Marcus simply shook his head: "Nottin' change attahl, y'know. Everyt'ing still de same. Crime is still bad, mon. Gov'ment still de same. T'ings dere is bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible."
And guns are still outlawed in Jamaica. Armed criminals still terrorize disarmed citizens, since still in Jamaica only outlaws (and the government) have guns.
Like the man said: Bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published originally in Fall 1998, pages 16-18 of The Firearms Sentinel, (now The Bill of RightsSentinel) the quarterly publication of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), - P.O. Box 270143, Hartford, Wisconsin, 53027 - phone: 414-673-9746; web site: http://www.jpfo.org)
Please include the following republication information with any republishing:
Permission is given to republish this article, as long as none of it is changed, shortened or altered, the author and JPFO are given full credit in any such republishing, and this entire republishing message, including the below message concerning Dial 911 and Die, is included. Author may be reached by writing to: Tina Terry c/o JPFO, POB 270143, Hartford, WI, 53027, or by e-mailing to question.authority@hushmail.com
For anyone wanting to know more about what the law requires of the police in regard to protecting citizens, an excellent reference book is available on this topic: Dial 911 and Die, by Attorney Richard W. Stevens, available from Mazel Freedom Press, Inc., P.O. Box 270014, Hartford, WI, 53027. See also http://www.jpfo.org. Dial 911 and Die painstakingly examines the laws of every state regarding the obligation of the police to protect citizens, and the right of citizens to sue should police fail to protect them. James Bovard, nationally syndicated columnist and author of several books, including Lost Rights, Freedom in Chains and Feeling Your Pain, all published by St. Martin's Press, says this about Dial 911 and Die: "Anyone who reads Stevens' book will realize that their right to dial 911 when in imminent peril is often worth less than a plug quarter. There are many fine police officers in this country. However, both the law and the courts have consistently held that police need not respond to citizens in deadly peril. When the government fails to respond, it is scant consolation that a policeman arrives after the crime to chalk off the body." Richard Mack, former Sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, says, "How I wish the information in this book were not true. Nevertheless, this book speaks to the irrefutable truth: police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact. I applaud Richard Stevens for his tremendous research and his courage to tell this truth."
Fall 1998 The Firearms Sentinel
How Gun Control "Worked" in Jamaica
© 1998 Tina Terry
Those who stridently and self-righteously lobby for the seizure of all guns by the government in America, particularly women like Sarah Brady, Barbra Streisand, Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, would do well to study the results of forced disarmament in other countries.
I have personally lived through a government-instigated disarmament of the general public, and its subsequent, disastrous consequences: From 1961 to 1977 my father (who is a white American, as are my mother, sister and I) was stationed with his family and business in Kingston, Jamaica.
Around 1972, the political situation in Jamaica had so seriously deteriorated that there were constant shootings and gun battles throughout the city of Kingston and in many of the outlying parishes (counties). In years past no one had even had to lock their doors, but now many people hardly dared venture out of their homes. This was especially true for white people, and even more especially for Americans, because of the real risk of being gunned down or kidnapped and held hostage by Jamaicans, who had become increasingly hostile towards whites and foreigners. My father took his life into his hands every morning simply driving to work. Going to the market or to do a simple errand was often a terrifying prospect. The open hatred and hostility which was directed at us seemed ready at any time to explode into violence, and indeed did so towards many people on many occasions, often with tragic or fatal results.
The Jamaican government decided that the only solution to this volatile situation was to declare martial law overnight, and to demand that all guns and bullets owned by anyone but the police and the military be turned into the police within 24 hours. The government decreed that anyone caught with even one bullet would be immediately, and without trial, incarcerated in what was essentially a barbed-wire enclosed concentration camp which had been speedily erected in the middle of Kingston. In true Orwellian fashion, the government referred to this camp as "the gun court."
My father and all of our American, Canadian, British and European friends, as well as middle class Jamaicans of all colors (locally referred to as "black," 'white," or "beige") knew that we were all natural targets of this kind of draconian government punishment. The relentless anti-American propaganda spewed forth by Michael Manley, Jamaica's admittedly pro-Castro Prime Minister, had resulted in the widespread hatred of Americans, British and Europeans by many Jamaicans. Racial hatred of whites and "beiges," as well as class hatred of anyone who appeared to have money or property, were rampant.
Consequently, we all dutifully and immediately disarmed ourselves, and handed our weapons in at the nearest police station. It was either that or be sent straight to the gun court. Even after we had disarmed ourselves, we lived in deathly fear that the cops, not known for their integrity, and well-known for their hatred of whites and Americans, would plant a gun or bullet on our property or persons.
So there we all were - government-disarmed, sitting-duck, law-abiding citizens and expatriates. Anyone can guess what happened next: the rampant and unfettered carnage began in earnest. Robberies, kidnappings, murders, burglaries, rapes - all committed by the vast populace of still-armed criminals. Doubtless the criminals were positively ecstatic that the government had been so helpful in creating all these juicy and utterly defenseless victims for their easy prey.
We've all heard the phrase, "When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns." I can personally confirm that this statement is absolutely and painfully true, because that is exactly how the Jamaican disarmament worked. At the time of the disarmament order, I was away at boarding school in the United States. However, I remember vividly coming home for the summer. I remember the muted but pervasive atmosphere of tension and terror which constantly permeated our household, affecting even our loyal black servants, who worked for and lived with us, and whom we took care of. (Practically every household in Jamaica, except the very poorest, had live-in servants. There was no welfare or public school in Jamaica, so middle-class families became completely responsible for the well-being of their servants, who were considered to be part of the family, including taking them to the doctor, and helping to educate their children.)
I remember lying awake in bed at night, clutching the handle of an ice-pick I had put under my pillow, and listening to the screaming of car-loads of Jamaican gangs going by our house, praying that they wouldn't pick our home to plunder. The favorite tactic was for a group of thugs to roar up to a house, pile out, batter down the door and rape, steal, kill, kidnap... whatever they felt like. They knew the inhabitants had been disarmed, and that they would be met with only fear and defenselessness. My pathetic ice-pick seemed incredibly puny, but it was all I could think of. Our family didn't even own a baseball bat. I remember lying awake thinking about how our beloved dogs were old and feeble, and that they could not protect us. And that I could not protect them either.
I can barely describe the abject terror and helplessness I felt as both a white American and as a young woman during that time. Jamaica was then about 90% black. Although I was (and still am) an American citizen, my family had lived in Kingston for almost 12 years when this situation occurred, and I considered Jamaica to be my real home. Many of my friends were Jamaican. My first serious boy-friend was Jamaican. For all its faults, I loved this beautiful, suffering island dearly, and I felt like a stranger when I was away at school in America, where I was always homesick for Jamaica.
When we had first moved to Jamaica in 1960, my sister and I (both blonde and obviously white) had been able to ride our horses up into the hills, and, whenever we encountered local Jamaicans, their salutation to us was open and friendly, as was ours to them. As things deteriorated into the reign of terror, and then the government instituted overnight citizen disarmament, when we ventured outside our home, we almost always encountered hate-filled stares and hostile hisses of, "Eh, white bitch! Eh, look 'ere, white bitch!" and other unprintable epithets.
Jamaica was, in the 1970's, a country with at least 50% illiteracy and an illegitimacy rate of over 50%. If a Jamaican girl wasn't pregnant by the age of 15 or 16, she was often derisively branded "a mule," sinc s, the offspring of horses and donkeys, are almost always sterile. Being a woman, let alone a white woman, in such a climate, especially after the disarmament of the citizenry by the government, was one of the most terrifying experiences one can imagine.
At that time, I had never held or fired a gun. I had rarely ever even seen a gun. No one in my family had ever learned about, used or even talked about firearms, except my father, who had been in the U.S. army. In our social circle, guns were deemed "unseemly" and "inappropriate" for polite society, and especially for young ladies. I had never given much thought to any of the Bill of Rights, let alone the Second Amendment. Yet we Americans all knew the Bill of Rights did not protect us in Jamaica, just as it hadn't applied to us at our previous station in Singapore.
My dad had fought in World War II, however, and had brought back a Luger pistol, which he had taken with him to Jamaica when we moved there after having spent 6 years in Singapore. No law had prevented his bringing a gun to Jamaica in 1960. When my dad handed that pistol and all his bullets in to the police, I vaguely realized that he was no longer allowed by the government to protect my mom, my sister or me, or our household.
I was pretty confused at the time. Terrified of being kidnapped, raped, murdered, robbed, at the same time I was still mindlessly anti-gun, because the criminals all had guns, and the government had declared guns to be contraband, and we were all terrified of being hurt by bad guys with guns, all of which somehow meant that guns must be "dangerous" and "bad" and therefore should be banned, just as the Jamaican government had decreed. As white Americans, our status was that of permanent guests in a foreign and increasingly hostile country. In fact, after 6 years in Singapore, and 12 in Jamaica, we well knew how to strive to be "model guests," which meant that questioning or challenging the Jamaican government's authority was unthinkable -- even when such government authority decreed that we be made helpless. None of us had any illusions about any "rights" to defend ourselves. We might have been able to do so with the government's blessing in the good old days, before chaos and violence and racial hatred had taken over. But now it was different. Now we were white, visible, foreign, sitting ducks in a hostile black sea. And I was a white, visible, foreign, female sitting duck.
As obedient as I was to authority, I grasped that our household was defenseless, and that I as a woman was particularly defenseless. And I realized that, had my dad still had his pistol, I would have felt much safer. I even realized that I would be willing to pick up a gun if my life were threatened. For a person who claimed to be anti-gun, these feelings really confused me.
At least eleven friends and acquaintances of my family were raped, kidnapped, murdered or robbed within about a year after the disarmament, and I believe it is a miracle that we are all still alive. I am convinced that many of these people would not have been victims had they not been disarmed by the Jamaican government. It was tragically ironic that the government had sold this whole disarmament program to us with the promise that: "We're here to help you, and this is for your own good and safety."
Because of this horrid and indelible experience, and of my interest in and undying loyalty to the American Bill of Rights, I have made it my personal business to study the history of the Second Amendment. I have studied related topics, too, such as police responsibility to citizens. It is my belief that many people believe that disarmament is no big deal, because it is the job of the police to protect us. Particularly many women seem to believe this. The media and of government authorities continue to generate pervasive and corrosive propaganda aimed at creating a helpless and disarmed populace. I used to completely believe this propaganda, but I have learned the following realities:
1. The police have no legal duty to protect individual citizens, and cannot be held responsible if they fail to do so. Even if a citizen's 911 call gets through to the emergency center, the police can simply choose not to show up, and the citizen has no legal recourse against the police. The courts have repeatedly ruled on this. As the court wrote in Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1982): "There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state to let the people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order." The U.S. Supreme Court, in MU 59 U.S. 396, ruled in a similar vein as far back as 1856.
2. The police carry guns primarily to defend themselves, not to protect us.
3. Because of items 1 and 2 above, we should all consider the police to be, essentially, historians. They show up after the crime has been committed and attempt to reconstruct and document the history of the crime. If the history is satisfactorily re-constructed, then the perpetrator is apprehended (if he can be found) and then (perhaps) prosecuted. This after-the-fact law enforcement does little good for the dead or wounded crime victims.
4. Women have a particular stake in preserving the right to bear arms. There is no way to describe the helplessness a woman feels when she is disarmed and made helpless by anyone. Add to that the rage she feels when the agency who is disarming her and leaving her at the mercy of rapists, murderers, goons and thugs, is a sanctimonious government telling her that it's "for her own good."
Although there are many serious issues in today's roiling political and social stew, I believe that preserving and restoring the Bill of Rights in general, and the Second Amendment in particular, is the most pivotal and basic issue to all Americans, and particularly female Americans, even if they don't yet know it. The consummate idiocy propounded by some folks (including some women) that the Second Amendment exists only to protect sportsmen's rights is particularly ridiculous relevant to women, most of whom don't hunt, and who care more about being able to get a decent hand-gun for self-protection than a hunting rifle to pursue deer or elk.
Anyone who thinks the Bill of Rights is either "out of date," "hokey" or "needs revising" - all of which I've heard from well-meaning but tragically ignorant and complacent Americans - should try living in a country which doesn't have one. I have been there and done that, and I don't want to go through it ever again - especially not in my own native nation. So I am dedicated to preventing today's government nanny from turning, as so often has occurred in history, into tomorrow's government despot.
Finally, I implore anyone reading this, particularly women, to likewise dedicate themselves to studying this issue carefully, and to likewise taking an active stance to preserve the Bill of Rights in general and the Second Amendment in particular.
Postscript: As of the latter part of August of this year (1998), it doesn't appear that the situation in Jamaica has changed much for the better. Many Jamaicans of all colors have immigrated to America to start businesses and to escape the hopelessness of the situation in their homeland. I recently spoke with a black Jamaican named Marcus, who has opened a wonderful Jamaican restaurant in Phoenix named Likkle Montego, where I can go and eat Jamaican food, and catch the latest news from my long-lost home. When asked how things are today in Kingston, Marcus simply shook his head: "Nottin' change attahl, y'know. Everyt'ing still de same. Crime is still bad, mon. Gov'ment still de same. T'ings dere is bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible."
And guns are still outlawed in Jamaica. Armed criminals still terrorize disarmed citizens, since still in Jamaica only outlaws (and the government) have guns.
Like the man said: Bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published originally in Fall 1998, pages 16-18 of The Firearms Sentinel, (now The Bill of RightsSentinel) the quarterly publication of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), - P.O. Box 270143, Hartford, Wisconsin, 53027 - phone: 414-673-9746; web site: http://www.jpfo.org)
Please include the following republication information with any republishing:
Permission is given to republish this article, as long as none of it is changed, shortened or altered, the author and JPFO are given full credit in any such republishing, and this entire republishing message, including the below message concerning Dial 911 and Die, is included. Author may be reached by writing to: Tina Terry c/o JPFO, POB 270143, Hartford, WI, 53027, or by e-mailing to question.authority@hushmail.com
For anyone wanting to know more about what the law requires of the police in regard to protecting citizens, an excellent reference book is available on this topic: Dial 911 and Die, by Attorney Richard W. Stevens, available from Mazel Freedom Press, Inc., P.O. Box 270014, Hartford, WI, 53027. See also http://www.jpfo.org. Dial 911 and Die painstakingly examines the laws of every state regarding the obligation of the police to protect citizens, and the right of citizens to sue should police fail to protect them. James Bovard, nationally syndicated columnist and author of several books, including Lost Rights, Freedom in Chains and Feeling Your Pain, all published by St. Martin's Press, says this about Dial 911 and Die: "Anyone who reads Stevens' book will realize that their right to dial 911 when in imminent peril is often worth less than a plug quarter. There are many fine police officers in this country. However, both the law and the courts have consistently held that police need not respond to citizens in deadly peril. When the government fails to respond, it is scant consolation that a policeman arrives after the crime to chalk off the body." Richard Mack, former Sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, says, "How I wish the information in this book were not true. Nevertheless, this book speaks to the irrefutable truth: police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact. I applaud Richard Stevens for his tremendous research and his courage to tell this truth."
Rudy
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/egan_giuliani_knights.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd328.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd315.htm
http://devvy.net/candidates/rudy_final.html
http://truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/search?q=Rudy+Giuliani+cousin
http://tdgwolfwatch.blogspot.com/2007_05_01_archive.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd328.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd315.htm
http://devvy.net/candidates/rudy_final.html
http://truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/search?q=Rudy+Giuliani+cousin
http://tdgwolfwatch.blogspot.com/2007_05_01_archive.html
Monday, March 23, 2009
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Arnold Schwarzenegger
10.22.03
Schwarzenegger's Secret Connections
______________________________________________________________________
A Cadre of Evil has Ushered Arnold Schwarzenegger to the Pentacle of Power in the Fifth Largest Economy in the World This is One of a Series of Articles to Overcome the Deliberate Censorship of Facts by the Government Media Complex
The Secret Connections of Schwarzenegger's
Appointee Thomas A. Nassif (Western Growers)
Most Californians think that a farmer or a representative of the farmers is someone close to the earth. A farmer would blunt Schwarzenegger's radical transition team who are yearning to regulate and control the people of
Naive people think the appointment of the president of Western Growers Association ... Thomas A. Nassif might add some common sense and slow down the new corporate socialism being imposed by George Pratt Shultz's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
The CFR plans for Open Borders, Internationalism and Socialism doesn't fit most American farmers.
Who trained Thomas A. Nassif ?
Thomas was the protégé of Archibald and Selwa Roosevelt. Thomas A. Nassif learned how to accommodate powerful and international leaders at the feet of Selwa. Nassif was her assistant. She wrote, Keeper of the Gate. It was published by Simon and Schuster. Joseph Barnes, editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster, was a member of the Council on Foreign.
Selwa Roosevelt was the White House Chief of Protocol . She held that position longer than any other person. Her husband, Archibald Roosevelt, Jr. and a graduate of Groton, as were Democrats, John F. Kennedy (Council on Foreign Relations) and
Averell Harriman (Skull & Bones) is known as the god father of the Democratic Party during the last century. He also graduated at
Another Groton Graduate was William P. Bundy (Skull & Bones). He was with the CIA from 1951 to 1961. He was with the law firm Covington & Burling. The partners had close relatives with terrorists and Communist activity (National Lawyers Guild). (Boudin).
William P. Bundy (Skull & Bones) gave hundreds of dollars for 
the defense of (Alger Hiss), CFR, Soviet Agent, and first acting Secretary of the (United Nations) in
This is where the Skull & Bones Satanic rituals of initiation take place in
The following quote is from America's Secret Establishment (p 170 Sutton, Liberty House Press) "We find the major overseas conduit for Nazi financing traces back to THE ORDER (Skull & Bones) and specifically to cell D115." That "cell" included Prescott Sheldon Bush and Edward Roland Harriman (Skull & Bones), Averell's brother.
The official emblem of Bundy, Harriman, Bush & McLeish.
Thomas A. Nassif was Selwa's assistant. Selwa received a Ripon Society award.
Sidney Weinberg on the left & John F. Kennedy
|
|
The Kennedy political apparatus has very much to do with Schwarzenegger.
The Ripon Society was financed by Henry Luce (Skull & Bones) and Sidney Weinberg of Goldman, Sachs. (Volume II p. 160) of the Biographical Dictionary of the Left. The Ripon Society is a front for the wealthy elite. It is designed to elect candidates that will "promote" the New World Order. A simple web search for the Ripon Society will bring you to forty present members in congress who are members of this the treasonous "sell out" gaggle.
Of the forty (Republicans,) eight are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) run by George Pratt Schultz. The Pratt family gave the very headquarters in NY to the CFR. It is from there that they have conducted their secret New World Order operations of deceit.
Tom A. Nassif was indoctrinated and became an agent for the
Tom A. Nassif's boss was the spouse of a CIA agent for over 30 years and a vice president of Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank.
We find in America's Secret Establishment (p.170), The extent of Chase collaboration with Nazis is staggering and at a time when globalist Nelson Rockefeller (CFR) had an intelligence job in
George Bush Sr. one of the most prominent heads of the Brotherhood of Death (Skull & Bones) ... while a UN ambassador, forced Free China out of the UN and installed Communist China in its place. This was after they set the record for mass murder. Bechtel then established Bechtel China, Inc.
George Pratt Shultz, a director of the Council on Foreign Relations, was president of Bechtel and headed its foundations. Former CIA Director Richard Helms worked for Bechtel.
The point is ... Schwarzenegger's "transition team" is pre-wired and their goal is that of a World Government to be built on the ashes of a once free constitutional republic.
These "appointments" were anticipated well in advance. Those selected by the team have been working together for decades in unity with the billionaires whose desire is to rule the world.
Tommy A. Nassif's (GIE) had offices in Bejing and
Tomas A. Nassif was a partner in the law firm ... Gray, Cary,
George W. Bush The Brotherhood of Death
George W. Bush's uncle is "an old friend" of the Richest Communist in
By Debbie Howlett,
|
|
|
|
AP | |
|
| |
|
|
-
Prescott Bush was criticized in 1989 for visiting
-
His
Prescott Bush, now 79, also developed a close working relationship with Rong Yiren, a former trade minister and vice president, who in 1993 introduced Bush to a group of Chinese business leaders as "an old friend." In 2000, Forbes publications reported that Rong, who has retired from government, was the richest man in
Alexander Haig (Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) , Trilateralist) , Kissinger (CFR, Trilateralist (T) , Bilderberger) opened up China, with ambassador George Bush (Skull & Bones, CFR, T, CIA) for personal riches at the expense of American workers.
Kissinger (director of CFR 1977-81) and Haig and their
Both, Republican Alexander Haig and Democrat Diane Feinstein (Trilateralist), another former mayor of
The point is the apple growers in
Globalist Thomas A. Nassif
His Open Border Propaganda Outfit
Mexican flags fly over
The Honorary chair people for this Ellis Island self awarding political scam include Hillary Clinton, Charles Rangel (CFR), and Senator Charles Schumer (CFR) plus scores of deluded politicians.
Globalist Thomas A. Nassif's history fits in perfectly with the new "Ministry" of Shultz-Schwarzenegger. Nassif is most useful because he looks conservative and represents the farmers. Little do they know?
The California Republican Party Board of Directors interfered in the primary process. They did it to appease and cooperate with the Council on Foreign Relations and the super secret coordinated Machiavellian operations of the Skull & Bones. The Board of Directors of the California Republican Party is infiltrated by the Council on Foreign Relations.
This Board of Directors acted just as the king did in
The hatred of the individual and individual thought is reflected in the 1931 Report of the Committee on Continuity of Business and Employment. Henry I. Harriman claimed, "A freedom of action which might have been justified in the relatively simple life of the last century cannot be tolerated today," ... We have left the period of extreme individualism and are living in a period in which the national economy must be recognized as a controlling factor. Schultz-Schwarzenegger has expanded that to include a global economy. NAFTA
National Socialism (Nazi) as a goal has been replaced. It is now International Socialism ... that the
Those people around Schwarzenegger are the A and B team ... they consist of former members of
They have gathered in
Controlling (Council on Foreign) operative David Dreier on the Left is behind
On
David Dreier is not a nice man ... he is evil. He protected the profits of the fine World Citizens ... like George Pratt Shultz, Thomas A. Nassif, Diane Feinstein, and Prescott Bush. Would we?
Council on Foreign Relations David Dreier like his "mentor" Council on Foreign Relations David Rockefeller head of the CFR for 15 years ... didn't even wince at someone else's' death. Not just someone but millions.
After visiting mass murder Mao Tse-tung (60,000,000 people killed) David Rockefeller, praised the Communist state. Rockefeller wrote that he admired their "community of purpose" ... (and that) "The social experiment in
For 15 years David Rockefeller, the admirer of Mao, was chairman of the CFR. The Rockefellers also gave the very land to the UN ... on which the building sits.
A good number of those countries are Rockefeller proxies, and others are kept line by the World Monetary Fund and Foreign Aid.
Hell, Mexican President Vicente Fox graduated from Harvard and worked for Coca-Cola. We find that Lovett (Skull & Bones) chose Sidney J. Weinberg and T, Herbert Shiver as a vital part of the half a dozen men placed in the John Kennedy's administration. Weinberg was a part of the executive committee of the Business Advisory Council. (BAC)
The Fix is IN
So was William E. Robinson of Coca-Cola a member of the BAC. Fox was dependent on the New World Order crowd before becoming president of
Their plan is a United American Union with one currency, similar to the European Union. The fix is in ... the death of a constitutional
That is unless you get off your butt and throw the bums out.
The American People are having their property yanked from them without the firing of a shot. In Communist Countries it was called agrarian reform. In
The biggest Crime A Parent can Commit is placing their child into a government school. Virtually every subject is soaked with one world government rhetoric and negatives toward
Senior Partner Sidney Weinberg, was on the board of directors of thirty of the biggest corporations in
Skull & Bones got its way in lodging BAC member Charles E. Wilson as Defense Secretary.
The Business Advisory Council
Sargent Shriver (Council on Foreign Relations) was the father of Maria Shriver.
Arnold Schwarzenegger has said his top advisor is Maria Kennedy Shriver and mother in law.
Sidney Weinberg was the Skull& Bones choice for a position with Kennedy.
Business Advisory Council member William M. Batten ... was of S.D. Bechtel (CFR). Member, Paul C. Cabot of J. P. Morgan, was also the treasurer of Harvard.
William E. Robinson, Chairman of Coca-Cola was also a member.
It should not be to big a surprise that Mexican Vicente Fox, Harvard graduate, and a Coca-Cola officer on a string is playing the part in a phony Punch and Judy show.
Except this show is going to strip you and your family of every freedom you ever had.
"David Rockefeller, Chairman of the CFR for 15 years ... also expressed pride in the fact that Chase Manhattan was the first Western bank to open for business in Communist China." The United Nations Exposed Wm. Jasper, Library Control Number 2001 135039 ISBN: 1-881 919-04-8
Californians No Different
The freedoms of Californians are no more significant to the New World Order than the freedom and lives of people killed and massacred in Communist
1)nationalists
2) xenophobic,
3) racist.
They are not nationalists because their trade policies hurt American workers. They could care less about the
California Congressman David Drier, a (CFR) cooperative, has received thousands of dollars from J. P Morgan, Bank of America and Trilateralist, Ken Lay of Enron. It's just too bad if your family is hurt in the process.
George Pratt Shultz heads J.P. Morgan International.
Your Children Are Being Dumbed Down
Their kids go to
The media networks, owned by the (CFR forces) have stepped up their daily trash delivery and are dumping it on the minds of your children. This same trash in a different format is being inoculated via the No Child Left Behind schemes of the Kennedys, Bushs, Schrivers and Schwarzeneggers. Their purpose is to separate you from you child.
It is designed to destroy the family. What the conspirator fear most ... is a healthy middle class family. They consider you dangerous should you ... instruct your child in individualism, in your religion, Western Civilization and particularly the Constitution.
Divorce is encouraged because it keeps the middle class at bay. An accumulation of wealth however small can grow into competition with them in the future. People economically secure tend to speak up and think for themselves.
The 2003 Kennedy/Bush "No Child Left Behind" education law "is the Il Duce" Mussolini program applied today ... the nationalization of local school systems.
This represents everything detrimental to
Previously, the community had control of local schools by voting for the board and funding their schools. The Kennedy/Bush "No Child" program is Nazi to the core. This scam is sold as I'm from the government I'm here to help you. And it was passed by Republicans and Democrats that are supposed look out for you and me. They seized our rights and turned them over to the National Government.
Most congressmen are frightened by the CFR Government/Media Complex. Congressmen who sell out like Congressman Dreier will always have a job at a University, tax exempt foundation, or be placed in lobbying or a law firm. We have incredible power to defeat them every two years. Expose the bastards. Ignore the media and work with your neighbors. Send Dreier and his type home to his family ... in order to save yours.
Wage and Price Controls is Fascism.
It was George Shultz under the Nixon regime who attempted to impose wage and price controls on the American people.
These are the same people who intend to impose their "social experiment" on the state of
Shultz is a global corporate Socialist through and through.
As George H.W. Bush said ... "We have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders."
Thomas A. Nassif is a major part of the "cabal." He is to keep a lid on the farmers while Marxist agrarian reform is being imposed under the new names of Agenda 21 and Smart Growth.
Shultz's minion, CFR Congressman David Dreier knows exactly what he is doing. And for Whom.
Do You?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)