Piper

Dear Brethren and Friends,

Greg Szymanski is hosting a debate between me and Michael Collins Piper today from 2-4pm EST. If unable to listen, it will be archived on Greg's site. www.thearticbeacon.com

It took me a week to read his most informative book, Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy. I learned much and the book is loaded with many significant facts.

Mr. Piper contends it was the Mossad that was the driving force behind the assassination. Though the Mossad had motive and was indeed involved in the assassination, it was the Vatican's Jesuits that oversaw the assassination: the Mossad was one of their many factions overseen by CIA Counterintelligence chief, James Jesus Angleton. Mr. Piper rightly portrays Angleton as the great personage manipulating events behind the assassination both before and after. But Piper wrongly states that Angleton was a creature of the Mossad, its minion in the CIA.

Final Judgment's great flaws are the following:

1. No mention is ever made of the Council on Foreign Relations in the body of his thesis. Only one mention is made of the CFR when critiquing a book in one of his appendixes.

2. No mention is ever made of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM). This is a critical mistake in that Angleton was a SMOM along with William F. Buckley, Jr., John McCone, Clay Shaw, Henry Luce and Alexander Haig, Jr., (whose brother Francis is a Jesuit) all of whom are named in FJ.

3. No mention is made of the secret meeting between all the players in the assassination at Clint Murchison's mansion on the night before the murder. Those in attendance were J. Edgar Hoover, John McCloy, Carlos Marcello, Lyndon Johnson and, among others, Jack Ruby.

What I learned from FJ was that JFK was against Israel's development of nuclear weapons and thus was an enemy of Masonic Jewish Zionist David Ben-Gurion. (Remember Revisionist Zionist Vladimir Jabotinsky called the Prime Minister "Stalin Ben-Gurion Hitler.") Further, if JFK sought to break the CIA into a thousand pieces, he would have effectively broke its surrogate, the Mossad, into pieces also. Further, if JFK sought to end the Pope's Cold War PREMATURELY in 1963 (later ended by the Knights of Malta at the Island of Malta in December, 1989), there could have been no justification for LBJ's military buildup of Israel that led to the Black Pope's successful 1967 war resulting in the Labor Zionist possession of the temple mount, having taken it away from Jordan. The 1967 war prepared for this present Papal Crusade against Islam (called for by Angleton) to include the ultimate demolition of the Dome of the Rock thereafter to be replaced with a Third Hebrew Temple---for the Pope. Further, if JFK would have ended the Pope's Cold War, the Vatican---secretly behind the Masonic Jewish Zionist government of Israel but openly against it---would have been forced to openly oppose the Arab nations whom it was befriending and building at that time. Clearly, JFK was an enemy of the Ben-Gurion Government and thus an enemy of the Jesuits ruling the Vatican via Pope Paul VI---the overseer of Pius XII's Vatican Ratlines. (Remember also that the Order sacrificed SS Colonel Adolf Eichmann then living in Argentina thanks to Bishop Hudal, using its CIA-controlled Mossad to bring the ex-Nazi to Jerusalem for trial. This key act saved the government of Ben-Gurion that was about to fall after the revelation that Rudolf Kastner was involved with Eichmann in deporting 400,000 Jews to Auschwitz shortly before the end of the war.) Since the CIA was a creation of the Vatican via the Knights of Malta and high-level Freemasonry, and since the Mossad was a creation of the CIA via SMOM Reinhard Gehlen, then yes, the Mossad was involved in the JFK assassination---Leah Rabin admitting that her husband, Yitzhak Rabin, was in Dallas the day of the murder. This will be included in VAIII because Piper's claims on Mossad involvement are TRUE.

But we are in "the times of the Gentiles" according to the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, which times will end with his second coming (Luke 21:24-27). As long as Jerusalem is under Gentile rule during the international Jewish Diaspora, then Gentiles rule every other faction of world government. This includes Gentile supremacy in banking, politics, religion, organized crime, military might and the sciences to name a few. The Jews involved in these arenas are SUBORDINATE, not Supreme over Gentiles. This is in perfect agreement with Deuteronomy 28:44, the Gentile being the head, the Jew being the tail this day.

The Gentile Jesuits of power have reversed this truth (ah, Black is White and White is Black), seeking to place the blame for the demise of world---and the United States---on the Jews in general. This is classic Jesuitism, and this is what Michael Collins Piper has done.

The debate will be well ordered and quite interesting. Please tune in, but don't drop out!

Sincerely in the Faith,

Brother Eric


_________________________________


If the Liberty Lobby is pushing Piper's books, that explains a lot. The Liberty Lobby was founded by Willis Carto, who was a disciple of the Jesuit trained fascist Francis Parker Yockey. http://www.johnreilly.info/dod.htm

-Mark Brewer

____________________


Agreed. To avoid the mass of historical facts against the Jesuits amassed by both of us---and many others---is to be either ignorant or dishonest. Mr. Piper is not ignorant of the power of the Vatican and is quite familiar with the Jesuit Order's Vatican house organ, La Civilta Cattolica. Although he conducted himself as a gentleman, I am more convinced than ever that he is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric


Thank you for contacting me.

Mr. Piper is a gentleman as is the host Mr. Szymanski. Mr. Smith lacks that quality evidenced by his past ad hominem attacks against me; although, I would debate him pursuant to the same identical ground rules to which Mr. Piper and myself agreed. A debate must always be for the benefit of the listening audience. Thus the opponents must address the claims of one another and refrain from sweeping frontal attacks which are unproductive leading to emotional responses depriving the audience of hitherto unknown facts necessary to reach reasonable conclusions.

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric


Rebuttal: Piper-Phelps Debate

by Vyzygoth


With all the falderal that surrounded the Michael Collins Piper - Eric Jon Phelps debate, which you, Victor, proclaimed a “unanimous decision” in favor of the former, I felt the need to pass along some final comments regarding the thesis of Phelps’ work.
I am not coming to his defense. He didn’t and wouldn’t ask me to do such. He’s a big boy and has acquitted himself well in the rough-and-tumble of talk-show discussions, call-ins, and the like.
What I think might have gotten lost in the winner-take-all atmosphere you engendered in your critique of the debate is an understanding that the accusations leveled at the Vatican and Jesuits are well-founded. I believe people should be aware that there are an abundance of books, newspaper accounts, and personal correspondences from across the centuries that indict the Vatican and the Jesuit Order for desiring world rule—a second Holy Roman Empire, if you will.
This is not conjecture. This is not theory. This is history. And it’s there for all to read.
Phelps and Charles T. Wilcox have done, what I consider, the best work on the Vatican-Jesuit nexus.
They, in turn, have based their work on the forms of information mentioned above. That information should be accessed—as I have done—to determine the veracity of Phelps’ and Wilcox’s works.
Years ago, when I looked into this, I did so not believing that what Phelps was maintaining was, in fact, true. But I had to find out. And I found that the Vatican and the Jesuits run the show.
Christians are forewarned in the New Testament that the enemy would eventually be found inside the gate, that Satan would come not as a hideous monster but as one of their own.
Therefore, what better disguise to wear than one of religiosity?
The Vatican is the smiley face; the Jesuits are the enforcers.
Undoubtedly, during the twentieth century, many global and quasi-political organizations have emerged. All have a job to do. But this entire New World Order network is not a horizontal structure.
The Zionist movement—measured against the Vatican/Jesuit existence—is modern. The relationship between the Rothschilds—perhaps the preeminent Zionists—and the Vatican is well-documented.
When I read accounts from the nineteenth century—especially mid-century—our political leaders are warned to be wary of Vatican not Zionist provocateuring.
At the Secret Treaty of Verona in 1822, several monarchies—the Holy Alliance—pledged themselves to destroy the concept of popular government that had taken root in the United States. It was called the Holy Alliance because the monarchies were pledged to do the bidding of the Vatican, not the Zionists.
When John Surratt fled the U.S. because of his role in the Lincoln assassination, he found safe haven in the Vatican Guard. The U.S. threatened the Vatican with a cessation of diplomatic relations unless Surratt was returned.
When Cecil Rhodes was preparing his Round Table to pursue his dream of global rule, he wished to create an organization that mirrored the Jesuits. The oath the initiates would take was to be based on the Jesuit oath. Nothing there about Zionism.
How many times have we seen our heads of state with the pope in the Vatican? How many times in the City of London?
Certainly Zionism is a palpable force in the United States, but it has become a much bigger concern in the last half of the twentieth century, with a dramatic intensification under the current administration.
I don’t deny that Zionism has had and is having an impact in the United States. I do wonder sometimes if resentment toward Zionism is pouring over to encompass all Jewry, all those who live in Israel? Is this fervor fueling what might turn out to be a pogrom?
In his analysis, Victor criticized Phelps for too often throwing together “dates, countries, names. . . .”
I would think that sort of information is referential and necessary.
Victor said the information was “never qualified by substantive (or significant) facts.”
To make that pronouncement, I think it would’ve been better if he had first checked out Phelp’s Vatican Assassins and Wilcox’s Transformation of the Republic and any/all of the works both authors list in their bibliographies.
With regard to the contradictions that exist between what the Vatican states publicly and does privately through the Jesuits, does Victor think it a stretch—since he clearly understands the NWO’s modus operandi—that duplicity, false fronts, and the Hegelian Dialectic are also in play with the Vatican?
Both Zionists and the Vatican ultimately wish to rule the world from Jerusalem. The Vatican is quite content to let the world’s ire draw down upon the Zionists, while it goes about its dirty business undetected.
The role of Zionism in the Grand Scheme cannot be denied, but to underestimate the power of the Vatican-Jesuit nexus is a huge mistake.