Barros Serrano's Research

You're daft. The Scythians were north of the Black Sea, not from Anatolia. Phrygians, yes. The Greeks were related to Phrygians, Trojans, etc., yes, back when they were migrating out from the Black Sea.

Now how do Khazarim get into this? THEY are originally a Turkic people from East Asia, and they got to the steppes of what had been Scythia long after those other peoples were active there. They were after the Huns. They had nothing to do with the others you mention.

The modern European Jews called "Ashkenazim" were so named because they were IN THE TERRITORY OF ASHKENAZ meaning the Slavics and Germanics. Ashkenaz refers to Poles, not to Jews. It is like someone from Armenia in California is an Armenian-American, but they are not descended from Americans, but from Armenians from somewhere else.

The word Ashkenazim denotes WHERE THEY LIVED, not who they are. Get it? THEY are Jews/Hebrews/Israelites... whereas you, on the other hand, are NOT.

__________________


These guys have no idea what is contemporary with what.

Now we've got Khazarim in the Roman army.


______________________________


Economic growth under Carter was completley staganant" That's just a lie. Carter ranks NUMBER TWO among post WWII Prez in the category of job growth specifically. Job Growth Per Year Under Most Recent Presidents Johnson 3.8% Carter 3.1 Clinton 2.4 Kennedy 2.3 Nixon 2.3 Reagan 2.1 Bush 0.6 -Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics Survey Reagan's tax cut was followed by longest, deepest depression since Hoover

I have posted REAMS of official documentation to support my conclusion that EGALITARIAN societies are (all things being equal) more productive than are those societies characterized by Reaganesque disparities in income and wealth.
But for the brief respite under CLINTON [See Weinberg, Census Bureau] the trend begun under Reagan results in just 1 percent owning more than about 95 percent of the rest of us combined.
Elites' windfalls are invested OFFSHORE and benefit NO ONE domestically.

What started this exchange was my state of FACT that JFK was among the BEST US Presidents in terms of job growth.
Notably, there is a BONESMAN among the very worst in terms of job growth.
It is a TRAGEDY for the nation that JFK did not LIVE to 'smash the CIA' into a thousand pieces.

The IDIOT posting here denies the existence of Skull and Bones. LOL LOL LOL LOL
Google: "Yale Daily News, Evolution of tap night "
The FIRST result takes you to Yale's OWN newspaper, The Yale Daily News where there is an article about S AND B 'tap night'.
S and B maintains a building on the Yale campus and you can LOOK AT IT with Google Earth.

That's all just GOP propaganda and revisionist B_____.
1) IKE sent the FIRST advisors to Viet Nam --NOT JFK.
2) JFK EXPERTLY DEFUSED the Cuban Missile crisis before WWIII could break out.
4) BAY OF PIGS was a ROGUE CIA operation. JFK was right to withdraw over. He had threatened to SMASH the CIA into a thousand pieces. The CIA is --in fact --the world's number one terrorist organization. I have the STATS to prove it.
It is too bad JFK was murdered before he could SMASH the CIA.

Supply-siders and Freideman-heads boast that the 80s were a golden era of American entrepreneurialism, but that's just NOT true. It was a golden era for the UPPER QUINTILE which alone benefited from tax cuts.
NONE of those tax cuts resulted in increased GDP as a result of increased investment. The Reagan DEPRESSION is the proof and result of that.
GOP policies esulted in 1 percent now owning more than 95 percent of the rest of us combined. Windfalls were just invested offshore. Not here.

Re: "Hopefully the C.I.A. had a hand in his death before he completly f___ the U.S. or made a few more idiot mistakes that would result in nuclear war "
They most certainly DID have a hand in his cold, blooded murder. That you would say such a thing just proves that you are a TRAITOR to this nation just as were the CIA conspirators who murdered JFK.
Motive for JFKs murder was that he had promised to 'smash' the CIA into a thousand pieces. The TRAITORS murdered him before he could do it.

There were many motives for JFKs murder but four seem most important in retrospect: 1) JFK threatened 'secret societies'; Skull and Bones??; 2) he would have ENDED the power of the FED; 3) he would have ENDED the OIL DEPLETION ALLOWANCE; 4) he threatened to 'smash the CIA into a thousand pieces'.
And he was NOT a liar. He was, perhaps, the LAST Prez to have ever told the truth.

JFK was among the BEST Presidents in several areas --prominently: JOB GROWTH. Job Growth Per Year Under Most Recent Presidents Johnson 3.8% Carter 3.1 Clinton 2.4 Kennedy 2.3 Nixon  2.3 Reagan 2.1 Bush 0.6 Those are the GOVT'S own stats --btw. I don't have final figures for JUNIOR yet. Safe to say --he will join the other gopps at the bottom.

Then why was JFK elected President?
Pundits, consultants, media --all say Nixon looked sweaty and shifty. Explanation: he WAS sweaty and shifty! Despite his protestations to the contrary, he WAS 'a crook'.
JFK was murdered because he would have dismantled the CIA, abolished the FED, withdrawn from Viet Nam. Cuban partisans were pissed because he withdrew air cover for the Bay of Pigs.
Google: existentialist cowboy, Three Reasons JFK was Murdered

JFK won the debate and the election.
When JFK was murdered (Oswald didn't do it), LBJ became PREZ. LBJ escalated Viet Nam and protected the 'oil depletion allowance' which JFK had said he would abolish.
Nixon did not become President until the elections of 1968 when he won over the Democratic candidate: Hubert Humphrey.
Nixon resigned before he would have been impeached in connection with the bugging of democratic headquarters by a odd collection of CIA spooks, prominently E. Howard Hunt.

lennhart 1 year ago

______________________

How to stop the depression

What needs to be done first of all is the commitment that not one nickel of public funds should be spent on bailing out bankrupt and panic-stricken junk bonds and other paper. The US needs a uniform federal law stating quite simply that, unless and until the president can certify that the current world financial crisis has been overcome, any and all foreclosures on homes, farms, businesses, hospitals, and infrastructure are banned. This would be accompanied by a debt freeze or debt moratorium on payment of principal and interest, again for the entire duration of the crisis. Something similar was done in the New Deal. The interests of bankrupt banks and mortgage lenders must yield to the social imperative of not evicting 10 or 15 million people over the coming months. No bailout of the financiers. Just a law that stops foreclosures, and lets the financiers, not the people, fend for themselves.

A federal ban on foreclosures is obviously a measure in the New Deal tradition. A monetarist follower of Milton Friedman or von Hayek, by contrast, would say that the homeowners who default should be thrown into the street, so that the market can work. A Malthusian might care only about the carbon footprint of the homes involved. A Mexophobe would rant that illegal aliens might get some of the money. In this wasteland of ideas, the New Deal approach emerges as the only one consistent with human life and human civilization in such a crisis.

Republican Ron Paul, interviewed on August 10 after the close by the infamous Kudlow, blamed the credit market panic on interest rates which had been too low. Paul should recall that any interest rates above 5 percent, as charged on these mortgages, are historically very high. (During World War II, for example, successful New Deal policies allowed a typical 2 percent yield for a 10-year Treasury note, with other rates in line with that.) Paul was adamant that there be no bailout, but did not distinguish between help for ordinary people facing foreclosure and eviction on the one hand, and bailouts for predatory financier sharks on the other. His only advice was to “let the market liquidate bad debt and bad investment” -- which, under current conditions, will mean that more than 10 million people will be thrown out on the street during the next few months. One hears an echo of monetarist Andrew Mellon, Herbert Hoover’s Secretary of the Treasury, whose advice on how to deal with the Great Depression was “Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate real estate. . . ." Those on the receiving end of such “creative destruction,” as Schumpeter called it, have generally lost their enthusiasm for monetarism.

Paul mocked warnings that “poor people are losing their homes” -- a sadly Dickensian moment, since that is just what is happening to 10 million Americans. When asked how much he would like to cut federal spending, Paul said that under his presidency it would come down by “50-60-70 percent” -- figures which seem to bode ill for the future of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, unemployment insurance, WIC, Head Start, S-CHIP (medical care for poor children), TANF (what is left of welfare for mothers with dependent children), and other programs which keep many Americans alive. The Republican line from Giuliani to Paul is that these institutions are part of the hated “nanny state.” When asked for specifics about what he would cut, Paul mentioned the abolition of the Department of Education, a favorite target of Republicans. Does that include Pell grants and federal support for subsidized Stafford loans, which are the only way the ghetto poor and much of the middle class can hope to send their children to college? No help here for victims of the current economic breakdown crisis, but Kudlow said that this approach would be well received on Wall Street..

GOPer Ron Paul has said that he admires the late Ohio Senator Robert Taft, “Mr. Republican,” who was like many in his family a member of Skull and Bones. One wonders if this admiration includes Taft’s sponsorship of the infamous union-busting Taft-Hartley Act, which has allowed many southern states to effectively block union organizing with so-called “right to work” laws, thus greatly facilitating the demolition of the US labor movement over recent decades. Taft-Hartley has been the key to the race to the bottom in wages and working conditions in this country. It should be repealed and replaced with a modern version of the pro-labor Wagner Act, which made it easier for workers to organize, bargain collectively, and defend themselves. Repeal of Taft-Hartley would be a first step towards rolling back the low-wage Wal-Mart/McDonalds model for the US economy.

-Webster Tarpley

_______________________________________

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TT7N6HTB0P18MK4CE/p2

Dick Gregory propagates this theory, that Jesse Jackson was an agent. I believe he says they intended to kill Ralph Abernathy as well, I forget...

Go to Youtube and search Dick Gregory and Steve Cokely and you'll find these speeches by them discussing several people involved with SCLC who they claim were agents, including Julian Bond.

-Savant

________________________________