Just because O'Mara pulled that stunt in court, proved nothing. He was not there that either. The timeline proves nothing. And, yes, I do believe that because he still had the items from the store proves that he in fact, never made it home, because the killer cut off his path and chased him back towards the T. What about the 2 minutes that are not accounted for, when the killer claimed he was going back to his car, after telling the dispatch to have the police call him, and he would tell them where he was? This is totally overlooked by you, and the prosecution overlooked it also.
______________________
It is clear you did the same. The killer never said he was punched in the back of his fat head. He said he was punched once in the nose, which supposedly broke it, and he fell, and then the head slamming happened, which was his self serving lie, which was witnessed by no one.
_______________
Once again, there was NO DNA on either of Trayvon's hands. No blood, no skin, no saliva, from the so called smothering, and no sweat anywhere on his hands or body, or on the sidewalk. Nothing. What don't you get about that? Are you so blind to see that it is totally possible that gz could have fallen and caused his own injuries to his head? Are you so blind to see that it is possible that the nose injury could have been caused by recoil from the gunshot? The fact remains that the forensic lack of DNA proves that there was no head slamming, and the fact remains that at the time of the shooting Trayvon was in the grass, not at the T or sidewalk, which makes the story of Trayvon being on top of his killer slamming his head on the sidewalk, a bold faced lie.
_____________
Z walked because the prosecution threw the case, and the jurors, at least 3 of them had decided he was not guilty before the first witness ever testified. Trayvon Martin did nothing to his killer, but run from him, and tried to keep him from trying to detain him, and as he begged for his life, he killed him to silence the only other witness to his misdeeds. If you listen to the 911 call, you can clearly hear Trayvon saying, "I'm begging you".
____________________
Your whole argument is assumption, which was caused by O'Mara sitting at his desk for 4 minuttes during the trial. That was not evidence, but just a show, as was the piece of concrete that was carried into the courtroom. The right turn you are talking about is making no sense. Even the killer did not claim that Trayvon made it home and doubled back.
______________________
My ancestors were from Africa, and forced to be here. Whether I call myself AA is of no concern to you. Get over yourself. Also if you fill out any application where what race you are is asked, there you find a space, with AA next to it. President Obama had nothing to do with it. He was asked his thoughts on this travesty of justice, and he answered the way he chose to. Get over that too.
_________________
Z was not even close to being a cop. Nor did he claim that the teen was doing anything but walking in the rain, not walking across anyone's property in the middle of the night, it was a little after 7 pm, and the most recent robbery was 6 months prior. The teen was unarmed, and was coming home from the 711, not planning some crime on a Sunday evening when most people are at home. Z and common sense, no way. Since when is walking suspicious? Z never said that the teen was doing anything else until the call continued. If the teen circled the car and reached in his waistband would a person with common sense have exited their vehicle for an address, after claiming suspicion? Z lied mutiple times, to justify his own aggression. Again, there was no DNA on the teens hands to prove a head bashing. Again, no proof of a broken nose from any Dr. or medical records, since the killer never was seen by a Dr at any ER or hospital. The killer had called the non- emergency number, and that should have been his part in this, as it was ever other time he called about some supposed crime. Out of his own mouth was his motive for getting out of his vehicle. "These a- holes, they always get away".
_____________________
When did the judge say that she agreed with the verdict? All the "evidence" was the killer's stories, which were not given by him. The only real witness is dead. The facts were not facts, but the killer's self serving reenactment, a photoshopped picture, an expert that did no testing on an actual hoodie, but killed a living animal, and a cartoon. The other evidence was vantage point testimony, after the shooting, a witness that saw 10 seconds of a tussle, and turned it into mma style punches, than recanted, family and friends of the killer, that lied and claimed that the one with the gun was screaming and a person that had a home invasion style crime by 2 black males 6 months prior to the shooting. The real evidence was no proof of any broken nose, no cement head bashing at the time of the gunshot, as the teen's dead body was some 40 feet from the T in the grass, and last but not least, there was NO DNA from the killer on either of the victim's hands. The jury completely ignored this. Also had the Dr. that did the victim's autopsy been able to actually testify, he would have said that the lungs of Trayvon collasped and filled with blood, preventing him from speaking at all. The prosecution threw this case, because they were forced by their governor to try it, instead of their standard of choosing their own cases to plea out, or take to trial. Two of the jurors should not have been seated. One's husband was a lawyer, and friend of O'Mara, the other had a son that was a lawyer also. They thought they were the smartest and forced their opinions that were biased from the moment they were chosen. They had the not guilty verdict before the first witness ever testified.
_________________
You have no idea what you are talking about. This young woman had a deformity called an underbite. She also speaks 3 languages, creole, jamacian, and english. She also had no idea what to expect in a courtroom testifying about a horrible incident in her life. This was totally the fault of the prosecution by not preparing their most important witness. They left her in a room by herself the first two days of the trial, with only the video of her depositon with Atty. West to watch. They also did the same with Dr. Bao, not preparing him, and not giving him his deposition from a year prior, or meeting with him until the 4th of July for an hour or so. Like I said, you have no right to comment about things you have no knowledge of. Ugh. She does deserve a chance to further her education, whether you think so or not.
________________
That is not true. He profiled Trayvon based solely on his race and gender. The very first thing out of his mouth to dispatch was "We've had some break ins in my neighborhood", which during the trial was the focus. The home invasion 6 months prior by two black males, that got away. The last witness the defense put on the stand, was the victim of that crime. The prosecution should have asked if Trayvon was a part of that break in. The only thing the two black males had in common with Trayvon was the color of their skin. The killer absolutely racially and criminally profiled Trayvon. Period. You cannot have it both ways.
_________________
It absolutely mattered to him. You have no idea whether his killer grabbed him or tried to detain him or not. And you are right, the teen had absolutely none of his killer's DNA on his hands, the supposed weapons, that caused the life or death boo boo's to his killer. As far as bruised knuckles, you are flat out lying. Trayvon had a small scratch on his left hand ring finger that measured 1/8th by 1/4th an inch. And still no DNA from his killer.
________________
There is no way that you followed this trial. Trayvon was on the phone with his friend all the way to the 711, and all the way back from this store, up until, he asked his killer "Why are you following me"?, and his killer's response, "What are you doing around here." Came back from where, his home? If he made it there, why would he still have his items from the store still with him? If he attacked a total stranger, and caused the life or death injuries with his hands, why NO DNA?
_________________
Try this one. Your 17 yr old teen is walking home from the 711, early evening, and is all of a sudden followed first by car, and then on foot by a total"stranger". Your teen is unsettled and describing this to a friend on his phone, calling the person following " creepy". The friend advises your teen to run, which he does, and feels he has lost the creepy stranger, and then realizes that the stranger is again behind him. How is asking, " Why are you following me"?, escalating the situation, that the creepy stranger started? You act as though Trayvon was supposed to know who this stranger was. At least I don't out and out lie. Rachel never, not once said that Trayvon made it home. Your links are useless because I don't need them. I watched the entirety of the trial, and my link was the 18 circuit court discovery evidence, including witness statements, written and verbal, depositions, the reenfakement video, autopsy, ballistics, and DNA evidence. There was no proof that the expert did any real testing on a hoodie, versus a live animal that he killed. Had the medical examiner been allowed to testify, he would have clarified the fact, that number one, Trayvon's lungs collasped and filled with blood, and that he would not have been able to speak, and number two, he was not on top of his killer when shot and killed. The prosecution threw this case, because they did not want it. It was forced on them by the governor of Florida. If anyone is brainless, it is you and your useless azz links. Also mr. Pudgy had been working out for a year at an mma style gym, and no matter, he was not running when he found his " suspect". Trayvon told Rachel that he had lost the creepy azz following him,,and he was by his father's place and was just going to walk fast, not run, as he had to lose the creep. Then as they were talking, he realized tbat the creepy stranger was behind him again. There was absolutely no testimony from anyone, including the killer that Trayvon backtracked to confront. The killer claimed that Trayvon came from behind him, but the exact opposite is what really happened.In the reenfakement the killer claimed to still be on the phone with dispatch as he walked back to his car, and when he got to the T, he was still on the phone with dispatch, when he claimed the teen came up behind him. Why was none of this heard on the call??? He never mentioned hanging up with dispatch before he reached the T. Stupid,not caring about justice, prosecution.
__________________________
Dismissed, as it should be. You can't profile, because of a break n 6 months earlier, by 2 other AA males, then profile Trayvon, and claim no racial bias. You cannot have it both ways. Race was always the elephant in the room. Period. You dodged a bullet, killer. Now.....Go Away!
_________
There was absolutely no sworn deposition by the killer. A walk through reenfakement does not qualify as that. A wrritten statement or interviews by SPD does not qualify either. The prosecution would do this, and they did not. They would have preferred to cross him on the stand, and of course he avoided this, although they would have not done a great job at that either. The forensic evidence was not even challenged, because the prosecution did not bother to hire an expert for the state to disprove or challenge the defense expert. Your assumptions about what I think as far people out to get people makes you wrong. The rest of your rant, is just that, a rant. I am not impressed. Save it, for someone, other than me.
______________
The only reason that gz made the call was because he Racially and Criminally profiled the teen. In my mind that is racism and a civil rights violation. Walking while black is not a crime, yet. Also you along with the jury paid no attention to the forensic evidence, that was clear. There was None, I repeat None of the killer's DNA ANYWHERE on the teen's hands, which there should have been, after the so-called life or death beating he claimed to have received by the teen. He was able to hop out of the police car, (handcuffed no less), and walk unassisted into the station. He never once asked to go to a hospital to be evaulated, for at the least a concussion, or to verify the so-called "broken nose". SMH. One other thing, there was never any witness to the provacation, except the killer and his many "ever changing stories", and a cartoon, that should have been strenuously objected to, and not been allowed as "evidence", by the prosecution to the judge. That alone, proved that the state threw this case. Justice my eye.
____________
The evidence was not challenged by the prosecution. Read the book, " Suspicion Nation", by lawyer, Lisa Bloom, who was in court everyday of the sham of a trial. How would Trayvon have known that the killer called the Non emergency line on him? Who told him this, his killer? The killer received an A grade in his self defense course, he knew just what to say. He is a liar, and the only other person to challenge his lies is dead. There was No DNA evidence on the victim's hands or any DNA, blood, brains on the sidewalk to prove some head bashing. Nothing at all. Yet he claimed a life or death beating. Such a liar he is. The prosecution was pathetic, and left it up to the jury to figure out the other side of the story. They never spoke for the victim. The only victim. Trayvon Martin. They did not prepare their two most important witnesses, nor got an expert of their own to refute the defense expert. Who, by the way testified in other murder trials for the defense, at 400$ per hr. Those cases were lost. A cop and a music mogul, were found guilty of murder. The only calls admitted into evidence were the last 6 that were made. All those calls showed a paranoid man with mental issues, no wonder he was on psychcotopic drugs. There was nothing reasonable about anything gz did after he made that call. Nothing.
-Regina Taylor
______________
Other Important Links:
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/12/chris_christie_other_republicans_wont_sign_anti-pollution_petition.html
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/01/13
http://www.ibtimes.com/blackout-how-argentina-eliminated-africans-its-history-conscience-1289381
http://www.ctka.net/2010/coogan_ajones_pt2.html
https://revolutionaryfrontlines.wordpress.com/tag/black-agenda-report/
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/T83C5VG0OM8C8STMN/p5#c106
https://web.archive.org/web/20130508211915/http://wikispooks.com/ISGP/organisations/Pilgrims_Society02.htm#fascism02
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment