A Debate on Ron Paul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbOE4Ip7In0&feature=related
RonPaulHatesBlacks (18 hours ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
I have never misrepresented Paul, and am not infatuated with Lincoln. You haven't studied your savior very well. He opposes every advancement in the history of American civil rights, including the EP and 13th Amendment that ended slavery and the 1964 CRA that ended segregation. He bragged about voting against the MLK holiday. He cast the only vote to send our taxes to fund the genocide in Darfur. And he made $940,000 a year writing and publishing (with Lew Rockwell) insanely racist newsletters.
RonPaulHatesBlacks (11 hours ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Nope. You unconstitutionally seceded because America elected a Free Soil president who threatened the expansion (and thus future) of your beloved slavery, the Cornerstone of your culture, religion, society, and government. That's what you said at the time, in your Cornerstone Speech and Mississippi, Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina declarations of secession. You should read them sometime.The North wasn't perfect, but it was better than your alternative of neverending slavery.
RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 day ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Slavery would have lasted another 100+ years. It was the Cornerstone of the South's entire culture, society, religion, and government. The Southern constitution barred any and all laws limiting slavery in any, at any time, forever. Neither Lee nor Davis fought for abolishing slavery---Lee oversaw slaves until December 1862 and Davis defended slavery his entire career.Either you're glad We the People ended slavery in the 1860s, or you support MORE years of slavery.

william0873 (18 hours ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Either you have some reason to try and hurt RP's rep and misrepresent him or you have some infatuation for Lincoln and will readily bash anyone who doesn't think he was perfect. Wouldn't doubt you're paid from what your channel consists of..As far as RP not liking other races, never heard him say anything bad about another race, but I know he does believe in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence which says ALL men are created equal. He also speaks honestly, even if its not popular

RonPaulHatesBlacks (19 hours ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Every single Northern state peacefully and voluntarily abolished slavery. They gave black people FREEDOM, the ability to read, move and travel, gain an education, and improve their lives. The South tried to build a nation on the Cornerstone belief that all men are NOT created equal, and adopted a constitution that barred any and all laws limiting slavery in any way, forever. You sought to own, rape, whip, and lynch black people until the end of time. No, thanks. All men are created equal.
RonPaulHatesBlacks (2 days ago) Show Hide
-1 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Read the South's own Cornerstone Speech and the Texas, Mississippi, Georgia, and South Carolina declarations of secession. The South declared that Northern abolitionists had been demanding an end to slavery for decades, and America then elected a Free Soil president who threatened the expansion (and thus future) of their beloved slavery, the Cornerstone of their religion, culture, society, and government.Read, study, research, THEN post.

RonPaulHatesBlacks (3 days ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
We the People ended Southern slavery in the 1860s. Either you're glad slavery continued no longer than the 1860s, or you support even MORE years of slavery. It's really that simple. If America had surrendered, the South would still be a separate, segregated, apartheid nation. Blacks would be denied civil rights, education, and the right to vote, Interracial marriage and anti-lynching laws would not exist, and slavery would have lasted 100+ years. No, thanks. All men are created equal.

RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Nope. All anyone with an open mind needs to do is read your own Cornerstone Speech and Miss, Georgia, Texas, and SC declarations of secession. You obviously never have.Lincoln was in the middle of the war, so some slaves had to wait an extra two years. That's better than your alternative of neverending slavery and segregation.No other country had 4 million slaves owned by racist traitors who seceded and started a war to save it. Obviously.Which races do I consider inferior, coward?

RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
You're an idiot. Lincoln didn't start the war. The South did, over slavery, before he could even take office. And the federal government did not impose Black Codes. Some Southern states had Black Codes decades before the war, and they all adopted and/or strengthened the minute We the People won the war and passed the 13th Amendment you hate so much.I'm a racist? Which race(s) do I consider inherently inferior? It's a simple question.Why can't you answer?

RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
After the war, the South imposed 100 more years of segregation, and ended that only at the point of Northern guns. Slavery would have lasted at least that long; indeed, the Southern constitution barred any and all laws limiting slavery in any way, at any time, forever. Hell, some people on this board would own slaves today if they could.I'm a racist? Really? Which race(s) do I consider inherently inferior?

vickyv85 (1 week ago) Show Hide
-2 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Okay RonPaulHatesBlacks does not like to look at the whole picture of what happened. First of all Lincoln wasn't against slavery he was against the expansion of slavery. The South's desire for independence had very little to do with slavery and more to do with the taxes that the Federal Government was placing on their economy. Less than 30% percent of Southerners owned slaves so why would the other 70% percent want to go to war with the North? Also only after the North was losing the war..

RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
-1 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
Lincoln did care about the slaves. He was a Free Soiler who opposed the expansion of slavery. And his thoughts are irrelevant, because he didn't start the war. The South did, over slavery, before he could even take office. He responded by freeing the slaves, which is why folks like you hate him.And, actually, We the PEOPLE formed the federal government via a perpetual and more perfect Union and a Constitution that forbids unilateral secession.
RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
The second sentence of Mississippi's declaration says:"Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world." Oops!!!The word "tariff" does not appear. The word "tax" does not appear. Oops!!!Instead, Mississippi said it seceded because the North dared to "advocate negro equality" and to form "associations to carry out its schemes of emancipation."All anyone has to do is read the South's own racist words.

RonPaulHatesBlacks (3 days ago) Show Hide
-2 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
The South unconstitutionally seceded and started the war over slavery, as you freely admitted in your Cornerstone Speech and the Texas, Mississippi, Georgia, and South Carolina declarations of secession. You should read them.The EP freed as many slaves as it could, given that America was in a war at the time. Neither it nor the North was perfect, but they were better than your alternative of neverending slavery.Lincoln did not establish Liberia and abandoned colonization during his life.

RonPaulHatesBlacks (1 week ago) Show Hide
0 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
That's what I said. He was a Free Soiler who opposed the expansion of slavery. That's why you unconstitutionally seceded and started the war in the first place. Lincoln wasn't perfect, but he was a lot better than your alternative of neverending slavery.No, We the PEOPLE created the Constitution and federal government, with its perpetual and more perfect Union, and federal guarantee of a republican government in all states. You've obviously never read the Constitution or attended law school.

RonPaulHatesBlacks (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+2 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
More lies. Slavery was not "on its death bed." That's absurd. You seceded to preserve it, and adopted a constitution that barred any and all laws limiting it, forever. When We the People sought peace in 1861, every single one of your demands related to the permanent protection and expansion of slavery.The EP immediately freed at least 20,000 slaves, freed millions more as We swept through the South, and made the 13th Amendment inevitable.The Morrill Tariff passed AFTER secession. Oops!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BStxubabDhA
_____________________






Ron Paul interviewed on CNN's "The Situation Room" speaks out against the Armenian Genocide Resolution Bill. He is also the individual who voted against action being taken about the genocide in Darfur, voted against Rosa Parks being awarded a Golden Medal. This man makes me SICK!
___________________________
Friend of J Reply:March 18th, 2010 at 1:06 pm
J,
I’m with you all the way. I’m not going to join the LaRouche youth movement any time soon, but I completely agree with his / Tarpley’s take on economic and political issues.
By Ron Paul’s logic, he should refuse a salary and give me back all my tax contributions, since nobody had a right to take them from me. They should sell all roads, libraries and public schools to the highest bidder (some Rothschild bank subsidiary) and give me a check. There should be no police or fire departments, no water delivery or waste treatment unless you subscribe to a private service.
Sounds like a frigging great idea. Since the “free market” turns everything it touches into either a slave plantation or casino, let’s embrace it and blame some corrupt bureaucrats for everything. Anything good that republican government ever achieved was either a fluke, a conspiracy, or really something to do with capitalism. There is no such thing as Abraham Lincoln, the “New World Order” is where Satan creates fixed-rate currency exchange agreements, and the US Constitution is a book about the free market you’re not allowed to read that was written by Murray Rothbard.
_________________
ArksmnokOfWiksunkor Says: March 18th, 2010 at 10:50 am
Ron Paul is part of the oligarchy and as such part of the NWO. He only interprets liberty in the way it suites him and his oligarchy fellows interests using double speak and generalizations. He is only afraid that he as dentist would not have the possibility to earn the amount of money he earns now if he and his medical and pharmaceutic lobby fellows would be forced to make reasonable prices for their services and provide good health for all the people. He is only afraid that he would then lose his special elitist status. Ron Paul is elitist and social darwinist hiding behind libertarian disguise who wants only that some chosen few can afford medical care. With his propaganda Ron Paul is helping the elite NWO to fulfill their eugenic agenda by not providing the health care for the ones that elites don’t consider worth of living healthy lives and so reducing their reproduction fitness and death rate. So if you support Ron Paul you only support NWO elites in fulfilling their eugenic agenda.
________________________
RonPaulHatesBlacks
5 days ago
Mississippi did, too. They said "Our position is thoroughly identified with the issue of slavery --- the greatest material interest in the world." They said that a blow at slavery "is a blow at civilization," and that they could only secede or suffer the "degradation" of free black people:sunsite . utk . edu / civil-war / reasons . html#Mississippi
_____________________
RonPaulHatesBlacks
6 days ago
Actually, the cotton gin INCREASED the demand for slaves from 700,000 in the South at invention to 3.5 million in 1860. His own museum website says: "While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor."__, haven't you studied American history at all?
simont7
5 days ago
@tikkigod011 Funny . . . South Carolina thought it was about slavery:americancivilwar. com /documents /causes_south_carolina. html
RonPaulHatesBlacks
1 week ago
Actually, the war did start over slavery. That's what the South said when they started it, in their Cornerstone Speech and Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, and South Carolina declarations of secession. Their declarations cited slave and slavery eighty-two separate times.
finister88
2 weeks ago
Rand Paul needs to do his homework. It's public knowledge that bribes were offered and taken to kill the regulation that would have prevented this "accident". Shame on him for calling this oil spill disaster an accident. And shame on him for calling the mine explosion an accident. If repeated warnings had been heeded, that too could have been prevented. "Accident"? Shame on you, Paul Rand.
picou
2 weeks ago
"maybe sometimes accidents happen"?! Tell that to the fishermen, the tourist business, the communities that live and work on the coast, the dead wildlife the ruined coastline....."maybe sometimes accidents happen"?!
franks2732
1 week ago
The funny thing (it is very sad really) is that Libertarians continually engage in the argument that government regulation is the cause of all evils in society. But when a clear example that a lack of Government intervention/regulation caused a company to put profits ahead of safety their answer is further deregulation. The libertarian view is that companies should run their own affairs. Well they did and now millions of people are suffering for it!
franks2732
2 days ago
@19TEC85 tell that to your poor and your overflowing prisons. And when is welfare a bad thing. My country Australia as well as the majority of western Europe welcome it. Society is more than a cheque book
Washington, D.C. Exhausted? Rand Paul looks rested and animated at WHAS. Earlier Paul canceled a national Sunday interview on NBCs Meet the Press after a second day of controversy regarding his ideological positions on civil rights, labor, and support for BP and big business interests despite their role in the Gulf Oil spill ecological disaster. MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews reported that Pauls cancelation on NBC was due to exhaustion; however, Paul scheduled an interview with a Kentucky media outlet for the same day. Cancelations are rare for Meet the Press as there have been only 3 similar cancelations in the 62 year history of the program.
RonPaulHatesBlacks
3 days ago
It's amazing you put up with it for this long. You have to understand that most neo-cons have never even studied US history, much less graduated with a degree in it. They support the South's cornerstone of racism and slavery for the obvious reason, which has nothing to do with the facts. But they're ashamed to make their real argument in support of slavery and racism, so they pretend to be trained historians. But they've never studied it, so they resort to unsupported claims and flat-out lies.
saulpaulus
3 days ago 2
@StonewallJackson26 Thoisands? Baloney! You make it up as you go along. Atlanta and Columbia were really the only significant cities that were destroyed. Agriculture was destroyed to deny its use to the Confederate armies. The Lawrence massacre was in August, 1863...very much during the war. Two hundred unarmed men were murdered. I could mention the Ft Pillow massacre, but murdering African American soldiers was passe for the Confederates generally speaking.
saulpaulus
3 days ago 2
@StonewallJackson26 It has NOT been disproven. It has been denied. So has the Holocaust. Both are true just the same. The South was NOT one big Andersonville. Northern prisons were as bad, that is true, but there is only one reason any of them existed: racism. The Confederacy refused to allow prisoner exchange to include African Americans once Lincoln allowed them to serve as soldiers. Therefore prisoner exchanges were ended and prisons were set up.
saulpaulus
3 days ago
@StonewallJackson26 I have suggested that many probably did. You are throughing around statistics with reckless abandon. The majority of those 600k+ deaths were northerners and far and away most deaths were due to disease. If most southerners had opposed secession which was treason, there would have been no war, no deaths, and no destruction. I should add that Confederate armies were hardly innocent. They kidnapped African Americans and took them south into slavery.
saulpaulus
3 days ago
@StonewallJackson26 Baloney! The purpose of the Emancipation was to make it clear that there would be a price that would be paid for secession. Lincoln wanted to keep the border states in the Union. Lincoln willingly risked his political future and even his life for the cause of Emancipation. In fact, Booth made his decision to assassinate Lincoln after he heard Lincoln give a speech advocating rights for freedmen. Your comment really slanders Lincoln.
saulpaulus
3 days ago
@StonewallJackson26 I think you mean 5% were large slaveowners, but yes a substantial majority of Southerners owner few if any slaves. But the non-slaveowning majority did not choose to rebel against their own elites. They supported them in their rebellion against the US govt. Why? In many cases, it may have been because they aspired to be large slaveowners themselves and did not want the US govt to deprive them of that right.
saulpaulus
2 days ago
@kirundo1 The slave trade was illegal long before the Civil War. Prior to its becoming illegal, slave ships generally went to ports in the south or the Caribbean. US forces entered parts of the so-called Confederacy to suppress a treasonous rebellion against federal authority that began because of Southern fears of abolition.

__________________________________________________


But SLAVERY wasn't unjust, isn't that what you think, Johnny Reb? LOL!!!

Typical Southern lies from Southern scum. The North did not INVADE the South... first lie. The SOUTH attacked Ft Sumter. The SOUTH was and is part of the USA. Lincoln could not have attacked his own country.

The govt has abused citizens who opposed ANY war, from the Revolution (post-war persecution of Loyalists) to Vietnam. That means nothing. So what?

Lincoln was shot for the same reason Dr. King was shot, and Bobby Kennedy for that matter. John Wilkes Booth = a fascist racist reprobate. Too bad he didn't live for a public hanging.

Lincoln's racism is irrelevant. The war was fought over SLAVERY, and any pro-CSA traitor saying different is a historical revisionist = liar.

Like you, Johnny.

-Barros Serrano


________________

Star Wars wrote:

The truth is your enemy.
The US military was never defeated in Vietnam. Never lost a single major battle. US forces turned over South Vietnam to the South Vietnamese government after a treaty had been signed with North Vietnam promising not to invade the south. The NVA assessment of the war had been that they were losing the entire time and the US could not be militarily defeated. Russian advisers were appalled at the lack of effectiveness of NVA and especially Viet Cong troops.
The North Vietnamese waited until all US combat forces were withdrawn then violated their own treaty and invaded the south. US embassy personnel evacuated along with hundreds of South Vietnamese personnel.
The 10 year Vietnam War stopped the domino theory in it's tracks. Massive US military and economic aid turned the Pacific countries at risk from their susceptability to communism into strong capitalist allies. Japan. South Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, and other countries supported the US and South Vietnam and kept communist insurgencies from any effective influence in their own countries. In Indonesia alone, 100,000 communists were killed by the government to make Russian and Red Chinese influence totally ineffective. The domino theory failed and Russia expended far more money than they could afford in support of North Vietnam. This expensive 10 year war in Vietnam along with Soviet setbacks in Angola, the Congo, Egypt, Cuba, Nicaragua, Berlin, and elsewhere nearly bankrupted the entire Soviet Union. President Reagan's "Star Wars" missile defense system was the last straw. The Soviets could not raise the funds to compete with America's technology edge in defense systems and space exploration. The Soviet Union collapsed and crumbled. The US won the Cold War and it was won largely because of Vietnam

 

________________________________________________

 

 

Barros Serrano wrote:

You can go on all day about slavery in the North. This is well-known to anyone familiar with African-American or USA history generally. It has NOTHING to do with the point about the Civil War. The North had ABOLISHED slavery in its states. The trade was GONE. The USA flag had stopped flying over slave ships. It was illegal.
But not in your glorious South! Oh no, they could still buy and sell not to mention grievously ABUSE people if they were labeled as "slaves" (any non-"free" black), and not only that were willing to put the country through bloody hell to retain that evil system.
Y'all can turn somersaults all day trying to avoid that unpleasant reality... pretend it's about states rights, Virginia's sovereignty (LOL... that one really is funny), go on about black Confederate soldiers and slaves in New York and Abe Lincoln's racism or whatever you like but it does not alter the obvious fact that the Civil War was fought over SLAVERY!!!
I can imagine how amusing you'd be if you could be transported back to 1862 to tell all of us how the war isn't over slavery! LOL!!!
John Brown's body lies a mouldering in the grave...
His Truth goes marching on!
---sung by many a Union soldier

 

 

Masonry

http://www.cuttingedge.org/free10.html

99romeos (2 years ago) Show Hide
-4 Marked as spam
Reply Spam
What shocks you the most about MORMONS? Baptisms for the dead. Secret handshakes. Worthiness interviews with children. Secret temple names.The total control this cult has over lives. The shunning of family & willingness to break up families. That people fall for Joseph Smith's claims of finding gold plates. Blacks not getting the priesthood until 1978. Excluding loved ones from weddings, even life-time Mormons can't go to weddings if they are not paid up. Mormons will become gods.

Economic Tidbits

From http://christianinfobomb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=14200


Remember FULL freemarket and privatization / corporatism proponents always tell you that such societies go broke etc, cannot compete, for decades norway is only goign further away from teh rest of the wealthy nations, PLUS enlarging funds and having an enormous budget surplus in the midst of the worst financial / economic crsis ever!!
Norway and a handfull other countries ROVe the oppsoite, prove them all wrong!! Norway can compete!! They built up society and everything is up and running, no problems financially....no poverty , universal healthcare, they have it all and STILL do better then any privatized 100% free market system. This is a bad example for ron Paul for example,that's why he never mentions it, it doens't fit in his marketing political picture that he has to sell you!!
Norway is Iceland before the crsis without those obscene debts and funds and reserves!! It's the best country of ther world to be!!
It also beats Switserland, who has a very laizes faire economy ala Rn Paul's style economy ( low taxes, private insurance, small govemrent)and is dropping fro decades, cannot keep pace and is becoming average in the list of advanced nations.
Switserland is also nowhere to be found with best healthcar,e education or anything, cause privatization doens't work!! Plus that the pricelevel is very high in Switserland and in comparisson they have not much left disproportionally, they might pay less taxes, but high prices and lots of insurances( insurances like in the US)
Purchasing power in many other countries with a lower income per head of the population is equal as in Switserland now.
Switserland is loosing steam for decades. I was there in 1989, then they said they where too expensive, now it's 20 years alter and they only lost their former advantage over other wealthy nations.
-Flying Dutch


_____________________


Top 20 wealthiest countries per GDP:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... P_(nominal)_per_capita


Quote:
1 Luxembourg 113,044
[b]2 Norway 95,062[/b]
3 Qatar 93,204
4 Switzerland 67,385
5 Denmark 62,626
6 Ireland 61,810
7 Iceland 55,462
8 United Arab Emirates 54,607
9 Sweden 52,790
10 Netherlands 52,019
11 Finland 51,989
12 Austria 50,098
13 Australia 47,400
14 Belgium 47,108
15 United States 46,859
16 France 46,016
17 Kuwait 45,920
18 Canada 45,428
19 Germany 44,660
20 United Kingdom 43,785

MY COMMENT, FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE IN FAVOUR FOR AUSTRIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS:

The Norwegian economy is an example of a mixed economy, featuring a combination of free market activity and large state ownership in certain key sectors. The state has large ownership positions in key industrial sectors, such as the strategic petroleum sector (StatoilHydro), hydroelectric energy production (Statkraft), aluminum production (Norsk Hydro), the largest Norwegian bank (DnB NOR) and telecommunication provider (Telenor). The government controls 31.6% of publicly-listed companies. When non-listed companies are included the state has even higher share in ownership (mainly from direct oil license ownership). Norway is a major shipping nation, and has the world's 6th largest merchant fleet, with 1412 Norwegian-owned merchant vessels (2009).

Most in the absolute top are countries with universal healthcare and more or less simular systems as in Norway.
It proves Ron Paul is wrong and he's wrogn for decades based on economic models, if he was right, thsoe countries should be heavily indebted compared to fully privatized countries, loosing steam, growing less and production woudl destroyed comapred to such privatized societies...not happening!! Only going further away.
Norway's GDP per head is competing with the Us decades before, little higher, little lower, now double for a few years and expanding only!!
Finland too, you only have to take in account that Finalnd collapsed when the USSR collapsed, it lost 25% of it's export at once. Denmark.

Sweden is a bit different, it's the most socialized country, it performs relativly bad, loosing steam, was far above most, loosing more and more, still moving higher away from the Us, despite performing bad. Also a bad example for ron Paul, even sweden!

My country is also an example, theNetherlands ( Holland) it's a mixture of 3 systems, the Anglo Saxon, German and Scandinavian system.
There's more privatization last 10 years then in Scandinavia, and that's the bad part, all that did damage. but like i said, it's stil mixed. so according to ron Paul's system we shoudl do worse then the Us, but GDP was 30-40% lwoer then in the US for quite along time, right now 15% higher. Never happened before. the Netherlands was the welthiest country of the world in 1981 for a while. With a 15% higher incoe per capita than the US, then it slipped back with a terrible recession the Netherlands had of heavily overspending and an obscene welfare state, like Sweden or beyond, that destroyed the economy, and a goverment after it was repairing it, only by massive cuts of expenditure for years, so that basicly did a lot of damage. Then it took years to come back, now it's in the top of the wealthiest again....like in the end of the 1970s. indeed, we had the dutch disease, that is whee you economically get too dependend on one sector of economy, that was gas for the Netherlands. Russia has this aswell. norway avoided it, being smart making funds in good times...expanding it. Why Norway is better then the Netherlands is because they exactly didn't make all those mistakes the dutch goverment and private partners did!!


-Flying Dutch

The JBS

http://watch.pair.com/jbs-cnp.html


http://watch.pair.com/cnp.html

http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm




http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/jbs.htm

Economic Information

From http://waronyou.com/forums/index.php?topic=12027.25

First of all no I don't listen to Lyndon Lerouche. You wanna know where my Economic Doctrine comes from? Stephen Zarlanga's the Lost Science of Money. Go and read it! I also read from essays by Benjamin Franklin whom I admire and somewhat Identify myself with. I NEVER read anything from Lerouche okay? SO there isn't going to be an argument over that because I'm not going to defend him.

Ron Paul's Economic doctrine comes from Adam Smith one of the MINOR founding fathers. He was friends with Jeremy Bentham who was a British agent. Bentham wrote an essay called "In Defense of Usury". The Mises insitute, which is linked to Ron Paul's campaign for liberty website has lovely essays like, "The case for a 100% gold dollar", and "In defense of the Robber Barons". (The Rockefellers).

Ron Paul's economic doctrine is the same as scharzanegger's. Cut everything, and hope the economy recovers.

The fact is Ron Paul wants us to do a) cut spending Obama wants us to do be B) subsidize banks that make nothing useful for the economy (which, is a vindication of Herbert Hoover's spending plan). When we should be doing C) revolutionize industry

Even the GOP says that we should spend SOME money. The Austrian economist says don't spend anything.

I don't care if Roosevelt was a Zionist, what he did worked, and we recovered. And I haven't seen any proof that he was. I've seen proof that Churchhill was.

And besides everything that was nationalized during the Roosevelt era was done through chapter 11 of the United state code. It's called a banking seizure and it's a required under the US code to do so. There is nothing communist about it because he didn't legislate it. By not seizing these bankrupt banks our government is breaking the LAW, and is making it harder to reform our debt money system. Everything he nationalized was temporary. It was done to convert policies not control business.


Even Roosevelt said referring to the bill that repealed the gold standard that he had not read the bill in fact no one had read it, but it passed. If he's zionist then why would he be allowed to do that even if he was ignorant of it? Who influenced our government to get rid of the gold standard then?


And who was the first to call Roosevelt a communist? Why it was the John Birch Society, which was funded by Nelson Rockefeller (zionist). Who was behind the Iran contra? why It's the Council for National policy, some of which were members of the John Birch society. The council for national policy set up Clinton's impeachment. They want a theocratic government in the United States. And what is Ron Paul an unofficial member of? The controlled John Birch Society. He's even been in a documentary with these people.

« Last Edit: October 24, 2009, 09:11:38 PM by Rainchild »

-Rainchild

Eisenhower and the Jehovah Witness

http://web.archive.org/web/20031016150416/members.shaw.ca/illuminaticonspiracy2/eisenhower.html


_____________________


From http://www.prisonplanet.com/jones_report_052303_matrix.html



The Matrix Reloaded: Revelation of the Method Alex Jones May 23 2003 The first "Matrix" was obviously new age in its overall presentation: that you've got to believe in yourself and then you can change the parameters of reality from within. And it had the overall message that there is another ...............................................................

PRISON PLANET.com Copyright � 2002-2003 Alex Jones All rights reserved. reality, that we are in a false reality. It covered and explained denial, how some people want to remain inside the lie and don't want to know the truth, don't want to remember the truth, want to be reinserted into the fraud at the cost of their sovereignty, their liberty, their freedom, their creativity. And it had, of course, a lot of violence in it but it was a fight against machines so it wasn't real human beings that were dying. And there were a lot of young people who were affected by the powerful and dark overtones of the film - and were obviously already unstable. Whether it was because of government programming or the general culture and (they) went out and shot people inside of the film. And so I was ambiguous. I am certainly a Christian and didn't follow the New Age, Hindu or Buddhist line but I was still overall not sure if the film was a production of the globalists. Well, now I am sure that The Matrix I and The Matrix II: "Matrix Reloaded," are in the most pure sense Illuminati productions. The film begins obviously with a group of trailers and there is a wide screen shot that has been squeezed down and distorted as an authority figure-type man in black sits behind a table with flickering subliminals being splashed on the screen, talking about power-aid. This is before the film begins. And he talks down to you and says you are not even going to understand what I'm saying to you - you pathetic mindless, hive-minded units. You are units that power the Matrix. Drink your power-aid. Do as you are ordered to do. So that's how the film begins. And then it launches into the world of the Matrix - that is the real physical world of the underground base of Zion. Yes, Zion. And you have the marauding forces that surface through the wrecked cities above and transmit the minds or the souls in a type of digital, astral projection into the machine world or the Matrix. And you are told that both of these are reality because perception is reality. And the whole film is basically Illuminati characters - dark masonic overtones with a dark occult leader. And he says that we are the occult, we're the vampires, we're the werewolves, we're the demons, telling them that ... And, of course, he called them Merovingian or the Merovingian bloodline. This is what the Satanists, based in France, believe that they are descendants of Jesus and his brothers, with Satan. This is deep occult, Illuminati stuff. And he tells them how pathetic and little they are and how they are controlled by their instincts, how he manipulates those. It's kind of like the speech you see Al Pacino give in "Devil's Advocate" and how they can't control these impulses. And how they really need the Illuminati. And he, of course, stays in a French castle. By the way, our royal leaders just met in a French castle in the very countryside they represent in the movie. Of course, the Merovingian is French. And, again, I'm just telling you about small tidbits of this. I've got to go back and take notes, which I will do. I've never seen a more powerful, overtly soul-twisting, mind-control film. There is lesbian and homosexual scenes in the film - mass orgies, similar to what the Greeks engaged in. There also is - everyone has chip implants and chip plug-ins - and this is a good thing. They have a little speech in there where if the machines aren't bad, we can fight them with all of this. So it is making the new fashion statement. Probably one of the strongest cultural movements we've seen in modern history is "The Matrix." The video games and the cartoons now and the bunch of spin-off cartoons for the big screen and DVD.

They are conditioning the children that it's normal to have plug-ins into your mind - wireheads, as they were called decades ago. It's fashionable to have in-plant points all over your body. Also, it gets into the Satanic view of 'Do as thou wilt.' You have people within the Matrix, different programs, fighting with each other for control and domination but at the end of it, you are face-to-face with the architect. And again, this is the masonic, 33 degree and above view that they are shaping our world and even if the Matrix is defeated, it still wins because it replicates itself. It is in time and space. It can go back in time and restart itself. And the architect is old man Sigmund Freud, Obe Won Kenobe- archtype who sits there and tells Neo that they have allowed people to leave the Matrix. That they discovered that suppressing an exodus from the Matrix actually causes a shutdown and a degradation of the 99% that remain inside their exoluthal (sp) tanks as human batteries for the power grid. And, again, you find out that basically the computers are disembodied spirits or angels or devils and have all the same carnal desires as humans but with an added viciousness, like Greek Gods. It is an Illuminati film through and through. They tell you we are the Illuminati, we are throwing this in your face. They look right at you on the screen and say we are taking over.

There is no way to defeat us. We are going to dominate you. We are going to bring you into the evermind - the hive mind. And it's not just Wired Magazine and Silicon Weekly and many other publications, including Salon Today, that are warning you of the takeover. Last year a new Army War College report, in 2000, came out and said within 25 years we will all be in a hive mind, that the Pentagon will oversee the insertion of the public into a control grid. That we will all be mounted in our homes, wired into a global government mind-control computer. It actually said this. The Sunday Morning Herald got the federal document. We called the head(garbled). The head scientist, a woman, said how did you learn of this, and freaked out and hung the phone up. These idiots, of course, release this stuff and don't even know what they are up to - or perhaps that was an act, we're not sure. Three years ago in 2000, the Army War College said the army's main job will be, through peer pressure, convincing the public to take brain chips by 2024, the same year number in the new report last year. They are preparing you for your journey into the real matrix. Now if you are shocked by this, I've been warning you long before "The Matrix" came out that this was their plan. The elite, of course, will not be implanted. And most of you are going to be killed after they release mass plagues. This is if they get you herded into the larger cities. And yesterday, I read from Wired News, out of the newest DARPA document where they say everything you do will be tracked and traced and you will be plugged into that system. I'm sure you saw all the newscasts in same exact words, in the same order, showing implantation of members of the public. I have promotionals where the family that took the chips is called "wonderous, genius, cool", "everybody wants it."

"Everybody is going to get it." As the Pentagon says, they are going to use hype to drive and push this. This is real. Truth is stranger than fiction. And to have the Illuminati shout at me for two hours was very, very painful. I was nauseated during the first 30 minutes of the film. I will have to, of course, when it's on DVD get a copy and try to free frame it. There was a continual flickering through the screen which they admit is for hypnosis. There are subliminals in the film both overtly in the tapestry in the buildings, in the background in what the people say. And, also just like with the "The Exorcist," which they now admit was written by the former deputy director of the CIA, they put flash frames, a primitive form of subliminal, in that film, which is now admitted - blood and guts and then Satan. There were other subliminals here. I'm not sure exactly what the covert sublimanals were but they were definitely there in the front of the film at higher levels and then saturated in emotional scenes when your conscious mind is diverted. In the primitive combat function, mammalian activity structure. So this is what we are facing. I recommend that you do not see the film. I know with the reverse psychology, you will probably see it. Curiosity killed the cat. I felt like walking out of the film. It was the most gripping experience of overt mind control I have ever experienced. You can see what the new science of film is going to be. So this is a warning to everyone. Definitely do not let your children see it. It is a preparation to go into the literal matrix being built by the Pentagon. In fact, just in case you are doubting me, let me re-read from Wired News yesterday, "A Spy Machine of DARPA's Dreams." This is not a spy machine. This is a cashless society control grid. Once you are buying and selling on the system, they will then launch attacks that are one-thousand times larger than 9/11, at least.

You will then be herded into cities, tracked and traced with cameras in your homes. Your children, who have already been conditioned, the Washington Post admitted, to body modification and piercing, to condition them to accept implantation. The films that are flooding out are conditioning them as well. The children's shows in Canada, like Spy TV, and the movies here, like Spy Kids, are all part of this preparation. It will be made a status symbol to be implanted and this is what the Pentagon says. So this is a tracking matrix grid that's being built by Sun Microsystems and Oracle and others. Oracle, got to go see the oracle. Yes, the Delphi technique. "A Spy Machine of DARPA's Dreams - http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,58909,00.html: "It's a memory aid! A robotic assistant! An epidemic detector! An all-seeing, ultra-intrusive spying program!" "The Pentagon is about to embark on a stunningly ambitious research project" Okay, DARPA had microphones in Austin by the hundreds, five years ago. They announced it after it was already in place. "The Pentagon is about to embark on a stunningly ambitious research project designed to gather every conceivable bit of information about a person's life, index" it and "and make it searchable" "What national security experts and civil libertarians want to know is, why would the Defense Department want to do such a thing?" "The embryonic LifeLog program would dump everything an individual does into a giant database: every e-mail sent or received, every picture taken, every Web page surfed, every phone call made, every TV show watched, every magazine read." "All of this -- and more -- would combine with information gleaned from a variety of sources: a GPS transmitter to keep tabs on where that person went, audio-visual sensors to capture what he or she sees or says, and biomedical monitors to keep track of the individual's health." "This gigantic amalgamation of personal information could then be used to "trace the 'threads' of an individual's life," to see exactly how a relationship or events developed, according to a briefing from the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency, LifeLog's sponsor." That's total information awareness now changed to LifeLog. And they meant to call it LifeLog all along, my friends.

They already have these systems set up. Bill Clinton gave speeches about homeland security in 1993. I've seen policy papers from twenty years ago calling it homeland security. Lifelog is a life log of everything you've done in your life, a recording of it and a digital psychological algorithm to be set up to tailor advertising the brainwashing systems. It's very serious. This is the end of the species if Satan wins. We must resist. But just be informed that "The Matrix" is a military industrial complex production in every way and as you go deeper down the rabbit hole, each trip until you are in a brain-scrambled position, not even able to resist the New World Order. Of course, the Tavistock Institute and other mind-control facilities have published studies and we have talked about them on air, where if you terrorize a mammal for a certain period, it will become docile and accepting. And they tell you in the film and explain the matrix to you and the New World Order and the Illuminati, so you can be more accepting of it. That you need that choice. That it is something they've got to do due to the rules of God's programming that they are converting and manipulating with their counterfeits. The oldest form of mind control is superstition. The witch doctor knew when the solar or lunar eclipse was coming and he was generally part of a hereditary guild, or kind of your first masonic lodge. And he didn't know why there was an eclipse but he knew when it was coming. And it happened so infrequently that people would forget about it. And he would use that knowledge to shock and amaze members of the tribe - and then get special favors: the best hut, the best women, the best food. And then later, you've got strong men over larger tribes that settled in agrarian societies, that is farming societies. The kings would learn how to have top witch doctors to manipulate and control the public. And that's what you have happening.

The globalists know that you are waking up to the fact that there is a New World Order. So they are playing up the psychics and the new age and all these other religions - the establishment Christians, as well. All putting out their propaganda. All putting out their false doctrines. And when you see a society in decline, the empires always use superstition and gladiatorial diversions to divert and distract them. And that is exactly what I saw in "The Matrix." And overall, the globalists in your face submitting its revelation of the method, Illuminati terms, homosexual orgies, and much, much more. This is a corrupting film. And if you tell your kids they can't go because they are too young or the movie is too cool for them, you ought to explain to them that it is something that can degradate them and to suck them into fad system and to control them. It is, my friends, overtly a mind control film. I can authoritatively say that to you here today. And that's all I'm going to say about it. You see we can defeat the New World Order on the basis of the information, on the basis of hard facts with God's help and direction. If they get us off into la-la land and get us off into delusional stuff, we are never going anywhere, my friends.

The Windsor's' Global Food Cartel: Instrument for Starvation

From http://www.whale.to/b/freeman.html



The Windsor's' Global Food Cartel: Instrument for Starvation

by Richard Freeman

This article appeared as part of a feature in the December 8, 1995 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. See Feature Introduction and Table of Contents.

Concentration in four food groups
Domestic markets
The control apparatus
Secret intelligence
The drive to the East

Ten to twelve pivotal companies, assisted by another three dozen, run the world's food supply. They are the key components of the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss food cartel, which is grouped around Britain's House of Windsor. Led by the six leading grain companies—Cargill, Continental, Louis Dreyfus, Bunge and Born, André, and Archer Daniels Midland/Töpfer—the Windsor-led food and raw materials cartel has complete domination over world cereals and grains supplies, from wheat to corn and oats, from barley to sorghum and rye. But it also controls meat, dairy, edible oils and fats, fruits and vegetables, sugar, and all forms of spices.

Each year tens of millions die from the most elementary lack of their daily bread. This is the result of the work of the Windsor-led cartel. And, as the ongoing financial collapse wipes out bloated speculative financial paper, the oligarchy has moved into hoarding, increasing its food and raw materials holdings. It is prepared to apply a tourniquet to food production and export supplies, not only to poor nations, but to advanced sector nations as well.

The use of food as a weapon can be found at least four millennia ago in Babylon. Imperial Rome took this tack, as did Venice and various Venetian offshoots, including the Antwerp-centered, powerful Burgundian duchy, and the Dutch and British Levant companies, East India companies, and West India companies. Today, food warfare is firmly under the control of London, with the help of subordinate partners in especially Switzerland and Amsterdam. Today's food companies were created by having had a section of this ancient set of Mesopotamian-Roman-Venetian-British food networks and infrastructure carved out for them.

The Windsor-led oligarchy has built up a single, integrated raw materials cartel, with three divisions—energy, raw materials and minerals, and increasingly scarce food supplies. Figure 1 represents the situation. At the top is the House of Windsor and Club of the Isles. Right below are two of the principal appurtenances of the House of Windsor: the World Wide Fund for Nature, headed by the Doge of London, Prince Philip, which leads the world in orchestration of ethnic conflict and terrorism, such as the British-created afghansi movement; and British intelligence's Hollinger Corp. of Conrad Black, which is leading the assault to destroy Bill Clinton and the American Presidency.

The firms within each cartel group are listed. While they maintain the legal fiction of being different corporate organizations, in reality this is one interlocking syndicate, with a common purpose and multiple overlapping boards of directors. The Windsor-centered oligarchy owns these cartels, and they are the instruments of power of the oligarchy, accumulated over centuries, for breaking nations' sovereignty.

The control works as follows: The oligarchy has developed four regions to be the principal exporters of almost every type of food; the oligarchy has historically acquired top-down control over the food chain in these regions. These four regions are: the United States; the European Union, particularly France and Germany; the British Commonwealth nations of Australia, Canada, the Republic of South Africa, and New Zealand; and Argentina and Brazil in Ibero-America. Through the centuries, the oligarchy has taken control of these regions' markets, and thus over the world food supply. These four regions have a population of, at most, 900 million people, or 15% of the world's population. The rest of the world, with 85% of the population—4.7 billion people—is dependent on the food exports from those regions.

British food cartel control intensified after World War II. Regions such as America had long been seen as important areas in which to increase control, in order to maintain the cartel's global domination, especially around the turn of the twentieth century when Minneapolis, under the control of the Pillsbury and Peavey families, replaced Hungary as the world's major miller of grain. But before World War II, the amount of grain that crossed borders, or oceans, seldom exceeded 30 million tons a year. America's share of that was usually 10 million tons or less. This was a substantial amount, but small compared to the levels of trade that would follow. World War II ravaged the globe, creating mass hunger, especially in Europe and what is today the Third World. Under the impetus of American programs such as "Food for Peace," PL 480, the worldwide trade in grain shot up to 160 million tons by 1979. Today it is 215 million tons per year. In addition, tens of millions of tons of other foodstuffs, from meat to dairy, are traded each year.

It is proper for countries with grain, meat, dairy, and other surpluses to export them. But the cartel's four exporting regions were given preeminence in a brutal manner, while much of the rest of the world was thrust into enforced backwardness. The oligarchy denied these nations seed, fertilizer, water management, electricity, rail transportation, that is, all the infrastructural and capital goods inputs needed to turn them into self-sufficient food producers. These nations were reduced to the status of vassals: Either import from the cartel's export regions, or starve.

Meanwhile, the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss food cartel reduced the export regions, which supposedly enjoy favored status, to a state of servitude as well. During the last two decades, millions of farmers in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, and Argentina have been wiped out. For example, in 1982, the United States still had 600,000 independent hog farmers. Today, that number is less than 225,000. The food cartel companies have concentrated hog production into their own hands. Farmers were paid far below a parity price, i.e., a price that covers costs of agricultural production plus a fair profit for investment in future production.

In 1983, Robert Bergland, President Jimmy Carter's agriculture secretary in 1976-80, told an interviewer concerning Cargill, the world's largest grain company: "Cargill's view is ... [that] they generally regard the United States as a grain colony." Bergland continued, "When [in 1979] the Russians invaded Afghanistan and Jimmy Carter asked how much grain the Russians had bought [from the United States] ... we couldn't tell him because we didn't know." But Cargill and the other grain cartel companies knew. In 1976, when Cargill, Continental, and other grain cartel companies sold the Russians a record 12.4 million tons of American and Canadian grain (creating a grain shortage in the United States), the administration of President Gerald Ford learned of the sales only after the fact. The grain may have been American grown, but the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss cartel disposes of it as it pleases.

This article will document, for the first time, the extent of concentration and control that the British-centered raw materials cartel exercises over both the international and domestic trade in food. It will look at the food cartel's international and domestic control of grains, milk, edible oils and fats, and meat. The article which follows provides a more detailed profile, with names and addresses, of the key forces in the cartel's control of the world's food supply.

Concentration in four food groups

Grains and grain products, milk and dairy products, edible oils and fats, and meat provide the majority of the intake of calories, as well as proteins and vitamins, which keeps the human species alive. Grain and grain products can be consumed as animal feed (especially corn and oats), and directly for human consumption, sometimes in grain form (the case of rice or barley), but often in a milled form, such as in bread and tortillas.

The "Big Six" leading grain cartel companies are: Minneapolis- and Geneva-based Cargill; New York-based Continental; Paris-based Louis Dreyfus; São Paulo, Brazil- and Netherlands, Antilles-based Bunge and Born; Lausanne, Switzerland-based André; and Illinois- and Hamburg, Germany-based Archer Daniels Midland/Töpfer. The first five of the companies are privately owned and run by billionaire families. They issue no public stock, nor annual report. They are more secretive than any oil company, bank, or government intelligence service. Just two of these companies, Cargill and Continental, control 45-50% of the world's grain trade.

We look at the food cartel's control over each of the four dominant food groups.

Grains: Grains, or cereals as they are often called, consist of wheat; the coarse grains, including corn, barley, oats, sorghum, and rye; and rice.

The Anglo-Dutch-Swiss cartel's control over wheat exports is shown in Figure 2. For the crop year 1994-95, the cartel's four food export regions produced and traded 88% of the world's wheat exports of 97.2 million metric tons.

But, the four cartel food export regions, while accounting for 88% of worldwide wheat exports, accounted for only 39% of all the world's wheat production of 522.4 million metric tons in the 1994-95 crop year (see Figure 2). That is, their share of world wheat exports was more than double their share of world wheat output. This underscores the point that the cartel built up four regions as the choke points over the world's food supply, even though these regions, collectively, are not often the largest producers.

Figure 3 shows, for the 1994-95 crop year, the percentages that the cartel's four food export regions control of the exports of the leading coarse grains. They control 95% of world annual corn exports, of 69.9 million metric tons; 76% of world barley exports, of 14.8 million metric tons; and 97% of world sorghum (milo) exports, of 6 million metric tons.

Within these export regions, the cartel's six leading grain companies have, historically, built up total domination of the external grain markets. While the cartel's export regions dominate 76-97% of the world's grain trade, depending on the grain, the cartel's six grain companies also control the exports of the four regions.

For example, in the 1994-95 crop year, the United States exported 102 of the world's 215 million metric tons in grain exports, nearly half the total. It accounted for 33% of world wheat exports, 83% of world corn exports, and 89% of world sorghum exports, making it the leading exporter in each of these three markets.

Now, let us turn to the leading grain companies' command of America's grain export market, with America itself controlling nearly one-half of all world grain exports. Figure 4 shows that the cartel's Big Six grain trading companies own and control 95% of America's wheat exports, 95% of its corn exports, 90% of its oats exports, and 80% of its sorghum exports. A few smaller companies, almost all in the grain cartel's orbit, control the remaining market share. The grain companies' control over the American grain market is absolute.

The Big Six grain companies also control 60-70% of France's grain exports. France is the biggest grain exporter in Europe (the world's second largest grain exporting region), exporting more grain than the next three largest European grain exporting nations combined.

Figure 5 shows that the Big Six, along with some affiliated Argentine companies such as Nidera and ACA, control 67.8%, or two-thirds, of Argentina's grain exports. Argentina is the fourth largest grain exporter in the world.

Canada and Australia combined are the world's third largest grain exporting region, after America and Europe. Although they have their own unique internal picture, with a modicum of political influence from farmers, both are British Commonwealth nations, under the thumb of Queen Elizabeth II.

In sum, the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss food cartel dominates 80-90% of the world grain trade. In fact, however, the control is far greater than the sum of its parts: The Big Six grain companies are organized as a cartel; they move grain back and forth from any one of the major, or minor, exporting nations. Cargill, Continental, Louis Dreyfus et al. own world shipping fleets, and have long-established sales relationships, financial markets, and commodity trading exchanges (such as the London-based Baltic Mercantile and Shipping Exchange) on which grain is traded, which completes their domination. No other forces in the world, including governments, are as well organized as the cartel, and therefore, London's power in this area remains unchallenged.

Milk and Milk Products: The big exporters of milk and milk products are three out of the cartel's four basic export regions: the United States; the European Union plus Switzerland (which is not an EU member); and the British Commonwealth countries of New Zealand, in particular, and Australia.

In 1994, the cartel's domination of dairy and dairy products was astonishing. Figure 6 shows that the cartel's food export regions controlled 89% of the world's export of whole milk powder, of 1.08 billion metric tons; 94% of the world's export trade of 653 million metric tons of butter; and 86% of the world's export trade of 1.11 billion metric tons of cheese. It also controlled a huge portion of the export of condensed milk.

The case of whole milk powder exemplifies the process of the cartel's control. Milk is not usually exported in liquid form, except for short distances over nearby borders; it is usually exported either as whole milk or skim milk powder, or as condensed milk. When it is exported as whole milk powder, it is reconstituted upon delivery, usually at the ratio of 10 parts water to 1 part whole milk powder. Of the world's export of 1.08 billion metric tons of whole milk powder in 1994, the developing world imported 885 million metric tons, or 82% of the total.

Nestlé Corp., S.A., based in Vevey and Cham (near Geneva), Switzerland, and Borden, Inc., based in Columbus, Ohio, are the two largest exporters of whole milk powder in the world. Founded in 1867, Nestlé grew significantly in 1905, when it merged with the Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company, also of Switzerland. Nestlé S.A. illustrates the food cartel's global reach: It is the number-one world trader in whole milk powder and condensed milk; the number-one seller of chocolate, confectionery products, and mineral water (it owns Perrier); and the number-three U.S.-based coffee firm. Its products include Nestlé chocolate and candy; Libby fruit juice; Carnation Condensed Milk; Buitoni spaghetti; Contadina tomato paste; Hills Brothers and Nescafé coffees; and Stouffers' restaurants and frozen foods. (It also owns 26% of the world's biggest cosmetic company, L'Oreal.) All told, it is the biggest food company in the world. In 1994, there were 13 countries in which Nestlé had sales of 1 billion Swiss francs or more, including all advanced sector nations. Its total 1994 sales were SF 56.9 billion, or $45.5 billion. Its 1994 profits were $4.8 billion, bigger than all but a half-dozen companies.

Nestlé chairman Helmut Maucher is on the board of J.P. Morgan, British intelligence's leading bank in the United States. Its board of directors serves as a retirement home for the world's central bankers: Fritz Leutwiller, former chairman of the Basel, Switzerland Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of central banks, is on Nestlé's board, as is Paul Volcker, who, as chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in 1979 and the early 1980s, put the world economy through what was referred to as "controlled disintegration."

Borden is the second biggest milk powder producer, through its KLIM milk powder division. It is also one of the world's biggest condensed milk producers, through its Eagle Brand sweetened condensed milk. In 1995, Borden was bought by the leveraged buy-out firm of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, which is headed by Henry Kravis, who was finance committee co-chairman of George Bush's 1992 Presidential campaign. As a result of the 1988 merger of R.JU. Reynolds and Nabsico, KKR now owns 33% of, and effectively controls, RJR Nabisco, which produces nine of the top ten cookies and crackers brands sold in America. KKR also owns a portion of Beatrice Foods, a conglomerate, which makes KKR one of the top five food companies in the world.

Completing the picture of world control of whole milk powder is Unilever, a large player in this area as well as the number-one world producer of ice cream and margarine. Typifying the Anglo-Dutch oligarchy's joint control over raw materials, Unilever, which is the result of a 1930 merger of a British and a Dutch firm, has headquarters in London and Amsterdam. On the Unilever board is Lord Wright of Richmond, GCMG. From 1986 through 1991, he was head of Britain's Diplomatic Service and also permanent undersecretary of state at the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Lord Wright is also a director of Barclay's Bank, which is a major funder of Prince Philip's World Wide Fund for Nature.

Unilever is an example of how the different corporate entities operate as part of one interlocked syndicate. The former chairman of Unilever, M.F. Van den Moven, now sits on the board of the other Anglo-Dutch giant, Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum, the world's largest marketer of oil and a controlling force in the energy cartel.

Meat: The cartel's four major export source regions (the United States; the European Union; the British Commonwealth countries of New Zealand, Australia, and Canada; and the Ibero-American nations Argentina and Brazil) exert enormous dominance over meat exports. As well, a Chinese bloc of China, Taiwan, and Hongkong (the last nation a re-exporter) is important in pork and poultry exports.

Figure 7 shows that for 1994, the cartel's basic food export regions commanded 85% of the world's export of beef and veal of 4.95 million metric tons; when the Chinese market is added in, these regions commanded 92% of the world's export trade of 2.1 million tons of pork, and 93% of the world's export trade of 5.84 million metric tons of poultry. The export of pork and poultry in China and Taiwan is increasingly run by the food cartel.

Four of the cartel's biggest companies in beef export are Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland/Töpfer, ConAgra/Peavey, and Iowa Beef Processors, now called IBP. The Dakota City, Nebraska-based IBP exemplifies how the oligarchy employs its corporate offshoots. Once owned by Armand Hammer's Occidental Petroleum Co., today 13% of the stock of IBP is owned by FMR Corp., the holding company for Fidelity Investments, the largest family of mutual funds in the United States, which is run by the Boston Brahmin oligarchical families. FMR is interlocked with other parts of the Windsor cartel—it is a large owner of raw material cartel companies, including shares of 5% or more of Homestake Mining, Coeur D'Alene Mines, and Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corp., three of the world's largest gold mining companies.

Through IBP, the food cartel is intervening in the U.S. Presidential elections, giving heavy backing to the "free enterprise" Presidential campaign of Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Tex.). On IBP's board of directors is Alec Courtalis, a Florida real estate magnate who was national finance co-chairman of the 1992 Bush-Quayle campaign, and is currently chairman of the futuristic Armand Hammer United World College and finance committee chairman of the Gramm for President campaign. In addition, Gramm's wife, Wendy Gramm, is an IBP board member. From 1988 to 1993, Wendy Gramm chaired the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during which time the CFTC rigged the explosive growth in speculative derivatives instruments.

Edible oils and fats: The United States, the European Union, and Argentina and Brazil thoroughly dominate the export market in the soybean and its by-products, the most basic source of edible oils and fats. Figure 8 documents that the food cartel export source sectors are the masters of 90% of the international trade in soybeans, of 32.1 million metric tons per year; 90% of the international trade in soybean meal, of 31.1 million metric tons; and, along with British Commonwealth member India, 92% of the 31.1 million metric tons of soybean meal exports.

According to spokesmen for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, as well as private industry, the same six companies that dominate the international grain trade also dominate the international trade in soybeans and by-products. The one additional cartel member company which is influential in the soybean trade, and which is smaller than the leading six companies, is S.I. Joseph Co. of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Burton Joseph, chairman of this company, is a former national chairman and a leading member of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. He is a longtime enemy of Lyndon LaRouche.

Feed and seed: The cartel also controls feed for animals and seed for planting. British Petroleum, through its Nutrition division, is the largest feed producer in Europe. Having bought Purina Mills from Ralston Purina Company, British Petroleum, one of the House of Windsor's key energy companies, is now the second largest feed producer in America. Cargill, the world's largest grain exporter, through its Nutrena Feed division, is also the biggest producer of animal feed and hybrid seed in the world, while Continental Grain, through its Wayne Feed division, is one of the biggest producers of feed and a major force in hybrid seed production.

Domestic markets

The cartel exercises an iron hand over the domestic agricultural economies of nations, especially those that comprise the four export source regions of the food cartel. This is exercised through the processing industries: If one controls the processing industries, one controls domestic trade. Except for use as animal feed, corn, wheat, and soybean cannot be eaten in their unrefined form (excluding sweet corn, which is eaten by humans, but which is a minuscule percentage of the annual corn harvest). The grain, or soybean (which is a legume), must be processed. The same is true of meat, which must be slaughtered and cut, before it is fit for human consumption.

This is where the processing-milling industries, in the case of grains and soybean, and the packing/slaughtering industries, in the case of meat, come in.

Taking America as the test case, in order to make the case generally, one can see the cartel's domination.

For example, Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12, demonstrate that the main grain companies of the oligarchy's food cartel control 71% of the milling of America's flour; 57% of the dry milling of America's corn; 74% of the wet milling of America's corn; and 76% of the crushing of America's soybeans.

(In the dry milling of corn, the corn is turned into corn meal, muffins, corn flakes, etc. In the wet milling of corn, the corn is turned into sweetener, starch, alcohol, ethanol, etc. Of America's corn crop of 7.4 million bushels, 5.6 million bushels will be consumed as animal feed; 1.5 million bushels will be wet milled; and 0.3 million bushels will be dry milled.)

Figures 13, 14, and 15 confirm that the largest meat companies in the food cartel (IBP, ConAgra, Cargill, and two smaller companies) control 72% of America's beef slaughtering/packing; 45% of its pork slaughtering/packing; and 70% of its sheep slaughtering/packing. The meatpacking industry demonstrates the accelerated rate at which the cartel is building its concentration in these industries. In 1979, the top four packers controlled 41% of the industry. Today, they control 72%.

Finally, as Figure 16 shows, four of the six leading grain cartel companies own 24% of America's grain elevator storage capacity. However, this figure is deceptive. Many of the grain elevators in America are in local areas, where there is a substantial degree of individual or cooperative ownership. When one gets to regional grain elevators, the grain cartel's ownership percentage is higher. And at ports, where grain is transshipped, the same four grain cartel companies own 59% of all American grain elevator facilities.

A farmer must sell his grain either to a grain elevator, or, in the rarer case where he can afford transport, to a grain miller. In either case, it is a grain cartel company to which he must sell. By this process, the grain cartel sets the price to the farmer—at the lowest level possible.

The control apparatus

The control of food for use as a weapon is an ancient practice. The House of Windsor inherited certain routes and infrastructure. One finds the practice in ancient Babylon/Mesopotamia 4,000 years ago. In Greece, the cults of Apollo, Demeter, and Rhea-Cybele often controlled the shipment of grain and other food stuffs, through the temples. In Imperial Rome, the control of grain became the basis of the empire. Rome was the center. Conquered outlying colonies in Gaul, Brittany, Spain, Sicily, Egypt, North Africa, and the Mediterranean littoral had to ship grain to the noble Roman families, as taxes and tribute. Often the grain tax was greater than the land could bear, and areas of North Africa, for instance, were turned into dust bowls.

The evil city-state of Venice took over grain routes, particularly after the Fourth Crusade (1202-04). The main Venetian thirteenth century trading routes had their eastern termini in Constantinople, the ports of the Oltremare (which were the lands of the crusading States), and Alexandria, Egypt. Goods from these ports were shipped to Venice, and from there made their way up the Po Valley to markets in Lombardy, or over the Alpine passes to the Rhône and into France. Eventually, Venetian trade extended to the Mongol empire in the East.

By the fifteenth century, although Venice was still very much a merchant empire, it had franchised some of its grain and other trade to the powerful Burgundian duchy, whose effective headquarters was Antwerp. This empire, encompassing parts of France, extended from Amsterdam and Belgium to much of present-day Switzerland. From this Venetian-Lombard-Burgundian nexus, each of the food cartel's six leading grain companies was either founded, or inherited a substantial part of its operations today.

By the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the British Levant and East India companies had absorbed many of these Venetian operations. In the nineteenth century, the London-based Baltic Mercantile and Shipping Exchange became the world's leading instrument for contracting for and shipping grain.

The five privately held grain companies were carved out from the centuries-old Mesopotamian-Venetian-Burgundian-Swiss-Amsterdam grain route, which today extends around the world. The Big Five are Cargill, Continental, Louis Dreyfus, Bunge and Born, and André. The Continental Grain Company is run by billionaire Michel Fribourg and his son Paul. Simon Fribourg started the company in 1813 in Arlon, Belgium. He moved the company to Antwerp, and then, in the 1920s, to Paris and London. Today, it has a New York office, along with a strong Swiss-French base.

In 1852, Léopold Louis Dreyfus, who was born in Sierentz, France, established wheat-trading operations in Basel, Switzerland. In this century, except during World War II, Louis Dreyfus has been headquartered in Paris (part of the old Lombard-Burgundian route).

Bunge and Born was founded by the Bunge family from Amsterdam in 1752. The company was eventually moved to Antwerp (today it is technically headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil and the Netherlands Antilles). The André Company was founded by Georges André in Nyon, Switzerland, and today is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Cargill Company, the world's largest grain company, is based in the Minneapolis, Minnesota suburb of Minnetonka. It was founded by Scotsman William Cargill, in Conover, Iowa in 1865, and has been run, since the 1920s, by the billionaire MacMillan family. But the true nexus of Cargill is in Geneva, Switzerland, where Cargill's international trading arm, Tradax, Inc., is headquartered, having been established there in 1956 (technically, Tradax is a Panamanian-registered company). Tradax has divisions all around the world, including in Argentina, Germany, and Japan. It is the major source for Cargill's international trading; Cargill has a lot of money invested in it, and Cargill reaps a large return from Tradax's operations. Tradax also has partial Swiss ownership. The Lombard, Odier Bank, as well as the Pictet Bank, both old, private and very dirty Swiss banks, own a chunk of Tradax. The principal financier for Tradax is the Geneva-based Crédit Suisse, which is one of the world's largest money-launderers.

Archer Daniels Midland's purchase of Töpfer, a Hamburg, Germany-based grain company, vastly increased ADM's presence in the world grain trade. Töpfer's trade is situated within the old Venice-Swiss-Amsterdam-Paris routes, and it has extensive business partnerships with the British Crown jewel, the Rothschild Bank.

Secret intelligence

The manner in which the grain cartel companies operate is highly secretive. All but ADM-Töpfer are private companies, and Bush ally and former Cargill employee Dwayne Andreas runs ADM as his personal fiefdom.

A strategic profile of each of the leading food cartel companies is contained in the following article, but it is worth noting here a few critical points about how they work. Much of their workings is shrouded in mystery, because they release little information to the public. People who have attempted to write books about the grain companies have spent years without getting a single interview from any of the reigning grain company families. Unlike many American companies, where the founding family has long since departed the scene, such as in the case of Morgan bank or Chrysler Corp., the grain cartel companies are run by the same families that have run them for centuries. The inter-married MacMillan and Cargill families run Cargill; the Fribourg family runs Continental; the Louis Dreyfus family runs Louis Dreyfus; the André family runs André; and the Hirsch and Born families run Bunge and Born.

However, the little that has been gleaned is very revealing. In 1979, Dan Morgan wrote The Merchants of Grain, about the world grain trade. He disclosed that Cargill's Geneva-based trading arm, Tradax, operates not only such as to park sales of grain in order to escape taxes in the United States and most countries, but it confounds anyone trying to follow Cargill's grain movements. In his book, Morgan reported:

"When Cargill sells a cargo of corn to a Dutch animal-feed manufacturer, the grain is shipped down the Mississippi River, put aboard a vessel at Baton Rouge and sent to Rotterdam. On paper, however ... its route is more elaborate. Cargill first sells the corn to Tradax International in Panama, which will 'hire' Tradax/Geneva as its agent; Tradax/Geneva then might arrange the sale to a Dutch miller through its subsidiary, Tradax/Holland; any profits would be booked to Tradax/Panama, a tax-haven company, and Tradax/Geneva would earn only a 'management fee' for brokering the deal between Tradax/Panama and Tradax/Holland."

While evading taxes and inspection, Cargill also uses its network to move large shipments of goods anywhere on the globe, on split-second notice. It has an in-house intelligence service that matches the CIA's: It uses global communication satellites, weather-sensing satellites, a database that utilizes 7,000 primary sources of intelligence, several hundred field offices, etc.

Cargill is representative of all of the grain companies, and a brief examination of it gives insight into all the others. Cargill, which had $51 billion in annual sales in 1994, has a dominant position in many aspects of the world food trade. It is the world's and the United States' number-one grain exporter, and has a market share of 25-30% in each of several commodities. It is the world's number-one cotton trader; the number-one U.S. owner of grain elevators (340); the number-one U.S. manufacturer of corn-based, high-protein animal feeds (through subsidiary Nutrena Mills); the number-two U.S. wet corn miller and U.S. soybean crusher; the number-two Argentine grain exporter (10% of market); the number-three U.S. flour miller (18% of market), U.S. meatpacker (18% of market), U.S. pork packer/slaughterer, and U.S. commercial animal feeder; the number-three French grain exporter (15-18% of the market); and the number-six U.S. turkey producer. It also has a fleet of 420 barges, 11 towboats, 2 huge vessels that sail the Great Lakes, 12 ocean-going ships, 2,000 railroad hopper cars, and 2,000 tank cars.

Cargill has been able to place its people in top posts around the world. Daniel Amstutz, a 25-year Cargill man, was U.S. Undersecretary of Agriculture for International Affairs and Commodity Programs in 1983-87, from which post he decided on the export policy of U.S. grains. He later became a leader of the U.S. trade commission in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations on agricultural trade. Meanwhile, the head of Bunge and Born, Nestor Rapanelli, became Argentina's economics minister within weeks of Carlos Menem coming in as Argentine President in 1989. Rapanelli began shifting Argentina from "State intervention to a 'market driven' economy."

Today, Cargill Company is privately owned and run by the MacMillan family. The MacMillan family's collective wealth, at $5.1 billion, according to the July 17, 1994 Forbes magazine, is larger than that of the better-known Mellon family. The MacMillans have always been of service to the British. John Hugh MacMillan, president of Cargill from 1936 to 1957, and then chairman from 1957 through 1960, held the title of "hereditary Knight Commander of Justice in the Sovereign Order of St. John (Knights of Malta)," one of the British Crown's most important orders.

The drive to the East

The food cartel continues to consolidate its worldwide control in the face of the oncoming financial disintegration. In the past four years, the food cartel has bought up many milling-processing plants and bakeries throughout the former Soviet Union and East bloc, bringing these nations under tight food control. Recently, IBP moved to dump cheap Mexican meat there, in order to bankrupt beef producers. The Clinton Agriculture Department has brought them up for investigation.

The food cartel has also built up its control, in the food distribution industries, through such combines as Philip Morris, Grand Metropolitan-Pillsbury, and KKR-RJR-Nabisco-Borden. In the case of Philip Morris, which owns Kraft Foods, General Foods (Post cereals), the Miller Brewing Company, and a host of other brand names, 10¢ of every $1 that an American spends on brand-name food items is for a Philip Morris product.

The food cartel's power must be broken. This year, the U.S. Justice Department's Anti-Trust division launched an investigation into price-fixing in the case of corn-based fructose and lysine, by Archer Daniels Midland and some of the other food cartel companies. The case, if brought to trial, could provide valuable information and help to expose and possibly halt, in a limited way, a few of ADM's practices. But the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss cartel is playing for high stakes—the ability to constrain the supply of raw materials, and above all, food, to turn back the clock of history, and reduce mankind from the 5.6 billion population it currently enjoys to the state of a few hundred million semi-literate souls scratching out a bare existence.

That assault cannot be fought timidly. The full truth about the food cartel must be known.