xtrashed 7 months ago
@12yash34
The Dead Sea Scrolls are authentic. As to where the 5200 pieces of New Testament manuscript are, they are probably kept in museums or protected by archeoligists, there may be info as to where they are kept if you search for 'Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts.'
The Dead Sea Scrolls are authentic. As to where the 5200 pieces of New Testament manuscript are, they are probably kept in museums or protected by archeoligists, there may be info as to where they are kept if you search for 'Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts.'
xtrashed 7 months ago
Christ means Messiah. The later pagans may have mixed Christianity with Paganism aka Serpais to gain converts at first, this has no baring on the actual faith of Christianity, the later pagans did this mixing much later, after the Christian faith was already established.
xtrashed 7 months ago
You need to read some history books on the history of Christianity, as I have said, Christianity was in Africa while Europe was still pagan so Christianity was not Greco Romanised.
xtrashed 7 months ago
@12yash34
How was Jesus' family lineage cursed and therefore disqualified? Paul doesn't contradict Jesus, Paul and Jesus teach the same thing. Jesus: (John 5:21), Jesus: (Matt. 6:25), Paul: (Phil. 4:6). Jesus: (John 10:11), Paul (Eph. 5:2). Jesus (John 8:58) compare with Exodus 3:14, Paul: (Col. 2:9). See also, Phil. 2:5-8. Jesus: (Matt. 6:14), Paul (Eph. 4:32). Jesus: (John 14:6), Paul (1 Tim. 2:5). Jesus: (John 5:24). See also John 3:16-18; Luke 18:9-13, Paul (Rom. 5:1).
xtrashed 7 months ago
The gospels were written before 325AD. The Gospels were all written before 100AD, we have thousands of pieces of manuscript evidence that can be dated to past 325AD. Deut 18:20 does not say Jesus was a liar. Nether does Matt 9:1. Matt1:11-12 doesd not say Jesus was cursed, neither does Jer 23:22-30. Where does Paul lie? Scholars agree that although Moses was the author of the Pentateuch, the report of his death was written by others.
xtrashed 7 months ago
Do you mean by Gnostic, the apocraphya? These books were rejected because therewas question as to their authenticity, where they were written and by whom they were claimed. The Gospels contained in the NT were those who's "pedegree" was impeccable. Books of more dubious origin, even though they might contain elements of interest, were not included in the NT canon.
xtrashed 7 months ago
Scholars agree that although Moses was the author of the Pentateuch, the report of his death was written by others.
Pastors/Priests don't do such crimes any more than the general population.
xtrashed 7 months ago
Finally, there are many problems with the authenticity of this letter: An authority as liberal as Walter Bauer (who would have loved to have made hash of this letter for his case for a diverse Christianity) notes that this letter is actually quoted by Flavius Vopiscus (a historian writing in 300 AD!), who in turn is said to be quoting Phlegon, a freedman of Hadrian (and what do skeptics always tell us about using sources this far from the root?!?);
xtrashed 7 months ago
As I put earlier from research I have found, A long time ago, the pagans used to mix two gods into one, in order to gain converts. As a matter of fact, Serapis is apparently a mixture of two gods himself. So when Christianity started growing, the pagans probably mixed Serapis with Jesus.
The overall point is: Jesus Christ isn't a mixture of several gods, rather, several centuries after Christianity was established, people started merging their gods to Jesus.
xtrashed 7 months ago
How can Christianity be a religion of the Europeans when it did not originate in Europe. I follow evidence, not racist nonsense like you follow. If you know anything about the history of missionaries in Africa, is that when Christian missionaries tried to mission to the locals they didn't get very far, Christianity grew among Africans by Christianity having an incredible ability to adapt to African peoples traditions. Indiginious Christendom.
xtrashed 7 months ago
There is plenty of proof in archeology that has been found that has confirmed the reliability of the Bible, but you wont dare look will you case, because you know you will be proven wrong.
'Shut up' calling me names? Ad hominum attacks mean nothing.
xtrashed 7 months ago
Huh? Many theologians, scholars and archeologists defend the historicity of the gospels. We have thousands of pieces of manuscript evidence for the Gospels and the Old Testament, they are authentic writings, we have archeological evidence. Search 'biblical archeology in to google. If you DARE!
xtrashed 7 months ago
The Bible is historical, historians trust it to be historical, and we have archeology to back the Bible up. Search 'biblical archeology' on google which confirms the Bible is historically reliable. The Gospels were written before the council of Nicea in 325AD. Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of the Phillipians, Papias, Pliny the Younger, Suetonius, Tacitus, Quadratus of Athens, Celus and many others write about Christianity before the council of Nicea, so you are wrong.
xtrashed 7 months ago
There is such as thing as absolute truth, and not all religions are true. If you want info on Christianity go to real credible historians not people like the man in the start of this video who have got an agenda to promote. A lot of the conflicts in Africa have nothing to do with religion, but have to do with political opression, the taking of land, the lack of resources etc.
xtrashed 7 months ago
_________________________________
http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress2/?p=13083
http://revolutionharry.blogspot.com/2011/12/eric-phelps-and-pleiades-sector-flight.html#more
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/ejps-published-beginnings-halcyon.html
http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress2/?p=13558
Re: “KING” (OF THE COUNTER-REFORMATION) JAMES VI/I & THE ROMISH CHURCH OF ENGLAND’S WAR ON THE REFORMATION’S GENEVA BIBLE & ITS’ ANTI-TYRANNY MARGINAL NOTES
Thanks Mike for forwarding the email below.
The main problem with the article that I forwarded was that it didn’t go far enough! It failed to show that the so-called King James Authorized Version also included large amounts of terminology & translation from the Romish Vulgate & in particular Douay-Rheims “Bibles” (the latter was – like the KJAV – issued to counter the Reformation & the Geneva translation – Rome & her quislings in the British Isles were quite shaken at the extent, reach & potential of this greatest of challenges to the frauds & fallacies upon which their totalitarian empires of imprisonment of the mind, body & soul were built.
I forward any interested parties to a number of other exposes of the Romish Church of England High Court Commission’s anti-Geneva agenda:
FURTHER READING (FOCUSING ON THE K.J.V., THE GENEVA BIBLE, KING JAMES & THE HIGH COMMISSION):
ESSENTIAL REFERENCE:
“Did the Members of the High Commission Court Have Any Influence on the KJV?”:
http://www.kjv-only.com/rick/influence.html
MORE KEY SOURCE REFERENCES:
“The Doctrinal Views of a “Superior” KJV Translator”:
http://www.dtl.org/versions/article/king-james.htm
“Archbishop Richard Bancroft & His Influence on the KJV”:
http://www.dtl.org/versions/article/king-james.htm
“The Great Hypocrite or the Great Dissembler”:
http://www.dtl.org/versions/article/king-james.htm
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS:
“A History Lesson”:
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fe…l?msg_id=00BilW
“History of the King James Version II”:
http://www.adamthwaite.com.au/html/history_kjv_ii.html
“Geneva Bible Notes (1599):
http://www.bloomingtonrpchurch.org/genevanotes/
“An Introduction to the Geneva Bible”:
http://www.reformedreader.org/gbn/igb.htm
“The Geneva Bible: An Historical Report”:
http://www.logosresourcepages.org/History/geneva_bible.htm
Authorized King James Version – Copyright Status:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorized_Ki…opyright_status
Vulgate – Reformation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgate#Reformation
I have no time nor inclination for debating anymore supporters of the like of Gail Riplinger but invite them to study the following (selected from literally dozens of webpages which present solid evidence of this witch’s black magic agenda:
http://avpublications.org/
http://avpublications.org/articles/gail-riplinger-who-is-she.pdf
http://watch-unto-prayer.org/TR-0-intro.html
http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/watch-unto-prayer/TR-5-greek-resources.html
http://www.kjvonly.org/james/may_reviews.htm
http://avpublications.org/articles/reason-for-exposing-gail-riplinger.pdf
http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/watch-unto-prayer/TR-gail-riplinger-records.html
In addition: So that your correspondent can become fully aware of the Jesuit’s false opposition plant “King” James (“VI/I”) “Stewart” Rizzio & of my presentations on the facts & evidences proving this & showing up the fraudulent nature of another crypto-Romanist who was put out to lead a false Anti-Jesuit Movement of the past decade I will include an excerpt from a post which I am currently compiling in reply to a critic of some of my other writings:
I have no truck with the “Vatican Assassins” author (nor his crypto-Jesuit/Opus Dei, pseudo-Protestant – meaning literally to Protest the Roman totalitarian system – ilk) … After several years of exchanging research via email with such a character, only to be called a “Jesuit” when I challenged his championing of the crypto-Jesuit King James VI/I & crypto-Romanist & Royal Arch Freemason George Washington – for which charges I have presented multiple irrefutable evidences for, I can say that I have no time for this practitioner of false rhetoric, though now is not the time & the place to go off on that particular tangent. For those wishing to see my proofs, please see the reposts of my research & subsequent debates with this false “Anti-Jesuit” figurehead see “King James VI/I, Freemasonic Monarch” at http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/01/masonic-king-james.html where a fellow researcher saved my writings on these matters which were swiftly deleted from a high-profile “Anti-Jesuit” forum shortly after, followed by my being unceremoniously banned for seeking the addressing of some egregious red flags in the work & background of said author.
For those interested in further reading on the self-discrediting false opposition Jesuit “exposer” in question I will note that I provided some breakthrough foundational research for the excellent piece entitled “Eric Phelps And The ‘Pleiades Sector Flight Comand’” at http://revolutionharry.blogspot.com/2011/12/eric-phelps-and-pleiades-sector-flight.html#more to which the researcher at that blog did much superb follow up digging that should demolish any lingering belief concerning the authenticity of this self-styled “Anti-Jesuit” & show that his modus operandi is effectively to act as a selected figurehead to monitor & discredit via association true independent investigative researchers exposing the Roman nexus’ (Jesuit/Papal knighthoods/Sabbatean Zionists/UGLE & AASR Masonic) globalist agenda. Some of my foundational research has been reposted by a long term correspondent at http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/ejps-published-beginnings-halcyon.html under the header “EJP’s Published Beginnings – Halcyon Unified Services and SPECTRUM”.
Anyone continuing to support “King” James “VI/I” & that devoted defender of his “enemy within” Jesuitical strategies is either a witting or unwitting stooge of the Jesuit’s international espionage network (in particular the alphabet & alphanumerical agencies of the US & British Commonwealth nexus, a.k.a. the “dogs” of the Anglo-American Establishment).
Peace be with you -
Troy
